You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@helix.apache.org by kishore g <g....@gmail.com> on 2013/10/14 18:31:22 UTC
0.6.1.x release
Hi,
0.7.0 release is taking longer than we expected it to take. We have made
significant changes in 0.7.0 and it will take some time to test it and
certify it for production usage.
Few folks are already on 0.6.1 and need some bug fixes. I was thinking it
might a good idea to make the changes for blockers in 0.6.1 and cut a new
release. we can call it 0.6.1.x or 0.6.2.
I know Alexander Porcelli is waiting for couple of fixes and Matthieu also
needs a fix for auto rebalance.
Thoughts ?
thanks,
Kishore G
Re: 0.6.1.x release
Posted by Zhen Zhang <zz...@apache.org>.
For this new release, we should include the following fixes:
1. auto-rebalance fix: HELIX-150/141/148/154/151
2. zk-session expiry handling fix: HELIX-169/170/171/195/124/28/123/79
3. security fix: HELIX-257/258
4. zkclient#close() fix: HELIX-264
5. state-model leak fix: HELIX-197
6. state model validation: HELIX-144
Thanks,
Jason
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alexandre Porcelli <po...@redhat.com>wrote:
> We really appreciate a new 0.6.x release!
>
> btw: One of my colleagues is already working on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-257 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-258 - so we probably will
> have a patch to you soon.
>
> Regards,
> ---
> Alexandre Porcelli
> Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat Business Systems and Intelligence Group
>
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:31 PM, kishore g <g....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 0.7.0 release is taking longer than we expected it to take. We have made
> significant changes in 0.7.0 and it will take some time to test it and
> certify it for production usage.
> >
> > Few folks are already on 0.6.1 and need some bug fixes. I was thinking
> it might a good idea to make the changes for blockers in 0.6.1 and cut a
> new release. we can call it 0.6.1.x or 0.6.2.
> >
> > I know Alexander Porcelli is waiting for couple of fixes and Matthieu
> also needs a fix for auto rebalance.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Kishore G
>
>
Re: 0.6.1.x release
Posted by Alexandre Porcelli <po...@redhat.com>.
We really appreciate a new 0.6.x release!
btw: One of my colleagues is already working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-257 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-258 - so we probably will have a patch to you soon.
Regards,
---
Alexandre Porcelli
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Business Systems and Intelligence Group
On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:31 PM, kishore g <g....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 0.7.0 release is taking longer than we expected it to take. We have made significant changes in 0.7.0 and it will take some time to test it and certify it for production usage.
>
> Few folks are already on 0.6.1 and need some bug fixes. I was thinking it might a good idea to make the changes for blockers in 0.6.1 and cut a new release. we can call it 0.6.1.x or 0.6.2.
>
> I know Alexander Porcelli is waiting for couple of fixes and Matthieu also needs a fix for auto rebalance.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> thanks,
> Kishore G
Re: 0.6.1.x release
Posted by Alexandre Porcelli <po...@redhat.com>.
We really appreciate a new 0.6.x release!
btw: One of my colleagues is already working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-257 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-258 - so we probably will have a patch to you soon.
Regards,
---
Alexandre Porcelli
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Business Systems and Intelligence Group
On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:31 PM, kishore g <g....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 0.7.0 release is taking longer than we expected it to take. We have made significant changes in 0.7.0 and it will take some time to test it and certify it for production usage.
>
> Few folks are already on 0.6.1 and need some bug fixes. I was thinking it might a good idea to make the changes for blockers in 0.6.1 and cut a new release. we can call it 0.6.1.x or 0.6.2.
>
> I know Alexander Porcelli is waiting for couple of fixes and Matthieu also needs a fix for auto rebalance.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> thanks,
> Kishore G