You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Jean-Damien Durand <Je...@cern.ch> on 1998/09/08 12:01:33 UTC
config/2969: -msym in LDFLAGS_SHLIB on OSF1/V.3.2
>Number: 2969
>Category: config
>Synopsis: -msym in LDFLAGS_SHLIB on OSF1/V.3.2
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Class: mistaken
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Tue Sep 8 03:10:00 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Jean-Damien.Durand@cern.ch
>Organization:
apache
>Release: 1.3.0
>Environment:
OSF1 axde50 V3.2 214.61 alpha
>Description:
Hello,
Just the following comment: on my OSF1/V.3.2 the -msym option is unknown.
>How-To-Repeat:
Testing compilation on such system, if you have one.
>Fix:
Either change the src/Configure file to remove -msym if OSF1 version is 3.2, or
suggest to use, if ld complains on this system:
setenv LDFLAGS_SHLIB "-shared -expect_unresolved '*' -s"
I've done it and it compiles then perfectly.
There is *nothing* critical, really nothing, in this report.
Thanks a lot.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer. ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]