You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by Daniel Naber <da...@t-online.de> on 2004/08/08 11:06:33 UTC

Re: Benchmark of filesystem cache for index vs RAMDirectory...

On Sunday 08 August 2004 03:40, Kevin A. Burton wrote:

> Would a HashMap implementation of RAMDirectory beat out a cached
> FSDirectory?

It's easy to test, so it's worth a try. Please try if the attached patch 
makes any difference for you compared to the current implementation of 
RAMDirectory.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

Re: Benchmark of filesystem cache for index vs RAMDirectory...

Posted by "Kevin A. Burton" <bu...@newsmonster.org>.

Daniel Naber wrote:

>On Sunday 08 August 2004 03:40, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Would a HashMap implementation of RAMDirectory beat out a cached
>>FSDirectory?
>>    
>>
>
>It's easy to test, so it's worth a try. Please try if the attached patch 
>makes any difference for you compared to the current implementation of 
>RAMDirectory.
>
>  
>
True... I was just thinking out loud... was being lazy.  Now I actually 
have to do the work to create the benchmark again... damn you ;)

Kevin

-- 

Please reply using PGP.

    http://peerfear.org/pubkey.asc    
    
    NewsMonster - http://www.newsmonster.org/
    
Kevin A. Burton, Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965
       AIM/YIM - sfburtonator,  Web - http://peerfear.org/
GPG fingerprint: 5FB2 F3E2 760E 70A8 6174 D393 E84D 8D04 99F1 4412
  IRC - freenode.net #infoanarchy | #p2p-hackers | #newsmonster