docs split of only to 4.2

[Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>]

H,

Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master
but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait
with that for some reason?

Daan

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

[Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>]

And i will hold my peace thee rest of the week.

mobile biligual spell checker used
Op 4 okt. 2013 16:28 schreef "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us>:

> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > H,
> >
> > Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master
> > but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to
> wait
> > with that for some reason?
> >
>
> There are two reasons that it's that way. First, some of the updated
> docs content never made it into master, so just copying over master
> from the main repo wouldn't work.
> Second, I am doing a bit of restructuring, and don't want to do it
> twice, so as soon as I get that done, I'll merge 4.2 into master and
> we'll have a place to start on 4.3 docs. I hope that I get this all
> done by CoB today.
>
> --David
>

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

[David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>]

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> H,
>
> Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master
> but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait
> with that for some reason?
>

There are two reasons that it's that way. First, some of the updated
docs content never made it into master, so just copying over master
from the main repo wouldn't work.
Second, I am doing a bit of restructuring, and don't want to do it
twice, so as soon as I get that done, I'll merge 4.2 into master and
we'll have a place to start on 4.3 docs. I hope that I get this all
done by CoB today.

--David