[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (CAMEL-372) JMS endpoints should default to be transactional; using the JMS transaction manager if no transaction manager is explicitly configured?

["Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=51274#action_51274 ] 

Claus Ibsen edited comment on CAMEL-372 at 4/19/09 12:25 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Willem

Yeah I have been trying to change the defaults and I think the issue with {{from (jms) -> to (jms)}} with *inOut* in the same route will fireback end users. 

So we can keep the option as disabled by default. 
Even though it would be unusual to use JMS *without* transaction in a real system.

Any thoughts from others?

      was (Author: davsclaus):
    Willem

Yeah I have been trying to change the defaults and I think the issue with {{from (jms) -> to (jms)}} with *inOut* in the same route will fireback end users. 
  
> JMS endpoints should default to be transactional; using the JMS transaction manager if no transaction manager is explicitly configured?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-372
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-372
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: James Strachan
>            Assignee: Willem Jiang
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Its such a common use case - using camel-jms should be transactional out of the box unless the user explicitly disables transactions. So defaulting the transactionManager property seems to make sense

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.