You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by "Lombard, Scott" <sl...@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM> on 2011/02/23 22:36:04 UTC
[Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Troy,
I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
Scott
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next couple
> of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > unnoticed.
> >
> > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > project until the website is updated.
> >
> > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> >
> > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > requires all of us.
> >
> >
> > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > by next Monday are:
> >
> > Troy Howard:
> > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> >
> > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> >
> > Michael Herndon:
> > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> >
> > Prescott Nasser:
> > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > status and information
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> >
> > Alex Thompson:
> > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> >
> > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > assignments?
> >
> > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> >
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
2.3.1->2.3.2 or 2.9.1 -> 2.9.2 transitions were done with just a single
patch, for ex.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Troy,
I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the
Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
Scott
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next couple
> of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > unnoticed.
> >
> > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > project until the website is updated.
> >
> > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> >
> > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > requires all of us.
> >
> >
> > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > by next Monday are:
> >
> > Troy Howard:
> > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> >
> > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> >
> > Michael Herndon:
> > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> >
> > Prescott Nasser:
> > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > status and information
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> >
> > Alex Thompson:
> > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> >
> > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > assignments?
> >
> > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> >
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
We can take,for ex, a namespace like Lucene.Net.Util(+test cases) and create
a single patch for all of the related issues.
(This approach needs to work on svn history, not on issues)
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
You're probably right DIGY. I will take a look at issues and create JIRA
issues where the complexity deems it appropriate. I will comment or patch
otherwise.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be
> done
> :)
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> Troy,
>
> I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the
> Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> wrote:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> > and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> > <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next
> couple
> > of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> > we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> > need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > > unnoticed.
> > >
> > > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > > project until the website is updated.
> > >
> > > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> > >
> > > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > > requires all of us.
> > >
> > >
> > > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > > by next Monday are:
> > >
> > > Troy Howard:
> > > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> > >
> > > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> > >
> > > Michael Herndon:
> > > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> > >
> > > Prescott Nasser:
> > > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > > status and information
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> > >
> > > Alex Thompson:
> > > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> > >
> > > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > > assignments?
> > >
> > > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >
> > >
> > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> > >
>
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Instead of looking at issues, use TortoiseSVN's compare revision utility.
Some issues seem to be complex but patches are really simple. See the fix
for 2 of 103 files below
DIGY
Index: Constants.cs
===================================================================
--- Constants.cs (revision 1049646)
+++ Constants.cs (working copy)
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
return s.ToString();
}
- public static readonly System.String LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION =
Ident("2.9.2");
+ public static readonly System.String LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION =
Ident("2.9.4");
public static System.String LUCENE_VERSION;
static Constants()
Index: PriorityQueue.cs
===================================================================
--- PriorityQueue.cs (revision 1049646)
+++ PriorityQueue.cs (working copy)
@@ -92,7 +92,26 @@
// We allocate 1 extra to avoid if statement in top()
heapSize = 2;
else
- heapSize = maxSize + 1;
+ {
+ if (maxSize == Int32.MaxValue)
+ {
+ // Don't wrap heapSize to -1, in this case, which
+ // causes a confusing NegativeArraySizeException.
+ // Note that very likely this will simply then hit
+ // an OOME, but at least that's more indicative to
+ // caller that this values is too big. We don't +1
+ // in this case, but it's very unlikely in practice
+ // one will actually insert this many objects into
+ // the PQ:
+ heapSize = Int32.MaxValue;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ // NOTE: we add +1 because all access to heap is
+ // 1-based not 0-based. heap[0] is unused.
+ heapSize = maxSize + 1;
+ }
+ }
heap = new System.Object[heapSize];
this.maxSize = maxSize;
-----Original Message-----
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
You're probably right DIGY. I will take a look at issues and create JIRA
issues where the complexity deems it appropriate. I will comment or patch
otherwise.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be
> done
> :)
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> Troy,
>
> I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the
> Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> wrote:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> > and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> > <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next
> couple
> > of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> > we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> > need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > > unnoticed.
> > >
> > > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > > project until the website is updated.
> > >
> > > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> > >
> > > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > > requires all of us.
> > >
> > >
> > > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > > by next Monday are:
> > >
> > > Troy Howard:
> > > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> > >
> > > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> > >
> > > Michael Herndon:
> > > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> > >
> > > Prescott Nasser:
> > > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > > status and information
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> > >
> > > Alex Thompson:
> > > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> > >
> > > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > > assignments?
> > >
> > > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >
> > >
> > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> > >
>
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
See the patch for "Lucene.Net.Util" at
http://people.apache.org/~digy/Lucene.Net.Util.patch
I haven't looked at test cases or run unit tests. But It is that easy to
port fixes for 4 files under "Lucene.Net.Util"
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
You're probably right DIGY. I will take a look at issues and create JIRA
issues where the complexity deems it appropriate. I will comment or patch
otherwise.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be
> done
> :)
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> Troy,
>
> I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the
> Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> wrote:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> > and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> > <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next
> couple
> > of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> > we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> > need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > > unnoticed.
> > >
> > > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > > project until the website is updated.
> > >
> > > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> > >
> > > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > > requires all of us.
> > >
> > >
> > > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > > by next Monday are:
> > >
> > > Troy Howard:
> > > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> > >
> > > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> > >
> > > Michael Herndon:
> > > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> > >
> > > Prescott Nasser:
> > > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > > status and information
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> > >
> > > Alex Thompson:
> > > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> > >
> > > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > > assignments?
> > >
> > > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >
> > >
> > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> > >
>
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Posted by "Lombard, Scott" <sl...@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM>.
You're probably right DIGY. I will take a look at issues and create JIRA issues where the complexity deems it appropriate. I will comment or patch otherwise.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Digy [mailto:digydigy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be
> done
> :)
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
>
> Troy,
>
> I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the
> Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> wrote:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> > and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> > <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next
> couple
> > of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> > we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> > need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > > unnoticed.
> > >
> > > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > > project until the website is updated.
> > >
> > > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> > >
> > > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > > requires all of us.
> > >
> > >
> > > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > > by next Monday are:
> > >
> > > Troy Howard:
> > > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> > >
> > > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> > >
> > > Michael Herndon:
> > > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> > >
> > > Prescott Nasser:
> > > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > > status and information
> > > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> > >
> > > Alex Thompson:
> > > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> > >
> > > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > > assignments?
> > >
> > > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >
> > >
> > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> > >
>
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
RE: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be done
:)
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slombard@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java Lucene changes
Troy,
I will start adding separate JIRA issues tonight. In the past do all the
Java Lucene issues translate into .Net issues?
Scott
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011at 2:20 PM ,Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> I would say the first task would be to collect all the Java changes up
> and create separate JIRA issues for each one.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Lombard, Scott
> <sl...@kingindustries.com> wrote:
> > I am on vacation next week. So I won't be very helpful the next couple
> of days. I will be able take on some things for the 2.9.4 release. Are
> we going to break down the Java Lucene changes to individual items that
> need to be ported or is it going to be handled as one big task?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:32 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Tasks due by 2/28
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I've recently been updating JIRA a lot and that's causing a lot of
> > noise on the dev list. Also, because of that noise, I fear that some
> > of the more important details of those changes might be passing by
> > unnoticed.
> >
> > Mostly, I'm trying to get the project cleaned up by the end of the
> > month. The goal is that March will represent a month of building out
> > our new infrastructure and creating our first new release as a team
> > (2.9.4). To that end, I'd like to resolve some of the outstanding
> > questions about tooling so we can get started building out solutions
> > with those tools. Also, I'd like to see our new status and efforts
> > announced publicly, but I'm hesitant to draw much attention to the
> > project until the website is updated.
> >
> > Additionally, I'd like to take a moment to apologize a bit for moving
> > at such a rapid pace. I realize this is not sustainable and could
> > cause some people to feel alienated if they don't have the time or
> > energy right this second to match that pace. I also feel a bit
> > self-conscious and am concerned that I'm being a little to much 'me',
> > and perhaps not enough 'we'.
> >
> > I have been taking a lot of liberty regarding the project direction,
> > bypassing some opportunities for community discussion and voting, in
> > the interests of pushing the project forward and catching up a bit of
> > lost time. Once we get past this initial push, I hope that we can slow
> > down a bit, and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > requires all of us.
> >
> >
> > So, that said, the outstanding tasks, which we can hopefully complete
> > by next Monday are:
> >
> > Troy Howard:
> > LUCENENET-381 - Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
> >
> > Sergey Mirvoda:
> > LUCENENET-398 - LUCENENET-391 Prepare the code for ingestion
> >
> > Michael Herndon:
> > LUCENENET-400 - Evaluate tooling for continuous integration server
> >
> > Prescott Nasser:
> > LUCENENET-379 - Clean up Lucene.Net website
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-403 - Improve site layout and design
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-402 - Update website to reflect current
> > status and information
> > LUCENENET-379 / LUCENENET-401 - Update website to be Apache CMS based
> >
> > Alex Thompson:
> > LUCENENET-380 - Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> >
> > Does anyone feel less than confident about being able to complete
> > those tasks on that schedule? Need any help? Want to change
> > assignments?
> >
> > Anyone in the community want to get involved as a contributor on any
> > of these tasks (or any of the open tasks in JIRA that are not listed
> > here)? Sergey could probably use some help on Luke.Net. Prescott has a
> > lot of work cut out for him on the website. Perhaps we should get the
> > ball rolling on 2.9.4 task assignments for everyone else?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
> >
> > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> > use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> > constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> > distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> > please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> > it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
> >
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.