You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flume.apache.org by Mike Percy <mp...@gmail.com> on 2012/02/08 20:07:13 UTC
Review Request: FLUME-957 remove unused json file
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3804/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for Flume.
Summary
-------
There is an unused json file in flume-ng-node/src/test/resources/ that should be removed.
This addresses bug FLUME-957.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-957
Diffs
-----
flume-ng-node/src/test/resources/flume-conf.json 4404ce3
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3804/diff
Testing
-------
Removed file from pristine branch source, ran mvn clean install ... no test failures.
Thanks,
Mike
Re: Review Request: FLUME-957 remove unused json file
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3804/#review4993
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
+1. Please attach the patch to the jira.
- Arvind
On 2012-02-08 19:07:13, Mike Percy wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3804/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2012-02-08 19:07:13)
>
>
> Review request for Flume.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> There is an unused json file in flume-ng-node/src/test/resources/ that should be removed.
>
>
> This addresses bug FLUME-957.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-957
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> flume-ng-node/src/test/resources/flume-conf.json 4404ce3
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3804/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Removed file from pristine branch source, ran mvn clean install ... no test failures.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>