You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@trafficserver.apache.org by "Alan M. Carroll" <am...@network-geographics.com> on 2013/11/01 03:15:39 UTC
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Sorry, this slipped by me.
I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
Monday, October 28, 2013, 3:22:09 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running ATS 4.0.1 on omnios. This system is running fine for a couple of weeks. Today we decided to allow more users to access the internet through this system. On the busiest moments a have seen two times a traffic_server restart with the next messages in the system log:
>
> FATAL: HttpSM.cc:2048: failed assert `!t_state.host_db_info.reverse_dns`
> Have someone an idea what happening,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sjaak
>
>
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by "Alan M. Carroll" <am...@network-geographics.com>.
I didn't think that made it in to 4.0.1.
Thursday, October 31, 2013, 10:44:09 PM, you wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
> But as far as i can tell, he’s running v4.0.1, which ought to have TS-1422? Unless we have a regression?
> — Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
But as far as i can tell, he’s running v4.0.1, which ought to have TS-1422? Unless we have a regression?
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by we...@fastmail.fm.
So, is it right to conclude that compiling 4.0.2 will probably not help me.
Sjaak
From: Leif Hedstrom
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 16:29
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org; dev@trafficserver.apache.org
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
Hmmm, the commit for TS-1422 says:
commit 043815e7a7a67b79a2ca6fdc3f6d6751e5150411
Author: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
Commit: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
TS-1422 TS-1307 : Update HostDB for better IPv6 handling.
That’s long before v4.0.1 was released. Or are you referring to a different commit that’s not in the 4.0.x releases?
Cheers,
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by "Alan M. Carroll" <am...@network-geographics.com>.
I will be out tomorrow but then I will look at this again when I am back online. I am sure I have seen this before and fixed it, I just need to find the right issue.
Friday, November 1, 2013, 11:07:53 AM, you wrote:
> So, is it right to conclude that compiling 4.0.2 will probably not help me.
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Sjaak Westdijk <we...@fastmail.fm>.
Thanks, we don't see the traffic_servers restart for a couple of days So
when 4.1.0 is out i will try to compile this. version.
Sjaak
On 11/3/2013 21:45, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, running too many bugs. The fix is in TS-1424, commit f63b27d52.
>>
>> It got mixed in because it was entangled with propagating a related error condition for TS-1424.
>>
>>
>
> Aha. Then yes, 4.0.2 does not have this patch, but current master and soon to be released v4.1.0 will have this. There will be no v4.0.3 release, so if you need this fix, upgrade directly to v4.1.0.
>
> Cheers,
>
> — Leif
>
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, running too many bugs. The fix is in TS-1424, commit f63b27d52.
>
> It got mixed in because it was entangled with propagating a related error condition for TS-1424.
>
>
Aha. Then yes, 4.0.2 does not have this patch, but current master and soon to be released v4.1.0 will have this. There will be no v4.0.3 release, so if you need this fix, upgrade directly to v4.1.0.
Cheers,
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by "Alan M. Carroll" <am...@network-geographics.com>.
Sorry, running too many bugs. The fix is in TS-1424, commit f63b27d52.
It got mixed in because it was entangled with propagating a related error condition for TS-1424.
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Sjaak Westdijk <sw...@fastmail.fm>.
So, is it right to conclude that compiling 4.0.2 will probably not help me.
Sjaak
From: Leif Hedstrom
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 16:29
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org; dev@trafficserver.apache.org
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
Hmmm, the commit for TS-1422 says:
commit 043815e7a7a67b79a2ca6fdc3f6d6751e5150411
Author: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
Commit: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
TS-1422 TS-1307 : Update HostDB for better IPv6 handling.
That’s long before v4.0.1 was released. Or are you referring to a different commit that’s not in the 4.0.x releases?
Cheers,
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Sjaak Westdijk <sw...@fastmail.fm>.
So, is it right to conclude that compiling 4.0.2 will probably not help me.
Sjaak
From: Leif Hedstrom
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 16:29
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org; dev@trafficserver.apache.org
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
Hmmm, the commit for TS-1422 says:
commit 043815e7a7a67b79a2ca6fdc3f6d6751e5150411
Author: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
Commit: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
TS-1422 TS-1307 : Update HostDB for better IPv6 handling.
That’s long before v4.0.1 was released. Or are you referring to a different commit that’s not in the 4.0.x releases?
Cheers,
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
Hmmm, the commit for TS-1422 says:
commit 043815e7a7a67b79a2ca6fdc3f6d6751e5150411
Author: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
Commit: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
TS-1422 TS-1307 : Update HostDB for better IPv6 handling.
That’s long before v4.0.1 was released. Or are you referring to a different commit that’s not in the 4.0.x releases?
Cheers,
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
Hmmm, the commit for TS-1422 says:
commit 043815e7a7a67b79a2ca6fdc3f6d6751e5150411
Author: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
Commit: Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com>
CommitDate: Mon Dec 10 11:02:42 2012 -0600
TS-1422 TS-1307 : Update HostDB for better IPv6 handling.
That’s long before v4.0.1 was released. Or are you referring to a different commit that’s not in the 4.0.x releases?
Cheers,
— Leif
Re: Traffic Server Fatal Error
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Alan M. Carroll <am...@network-geographics.com> wrote:
> Sorry, this slipped by me.
>
> I think this is a known problem - try the patch from TS-1422 and see if that fixes it.
But as far as i can tell, he’s running v4.0.1, which ought to have TS-1422? Unless we have a regression?
— Leif