Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)

[Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>]

On 22/03/12 18:28, Paolo Castagna wrote:
...

> LARQ isn't distributed as a binary .zip distribution to be used by
> non developers. I removed the shell scripts, now mvn package will
> create a one jar which can be used to run commands easily.

I tried mvn package and it puts the with-dependencies in target.Am I 
right in assuming that means for releases from now there'll also be a 
with-dependencies.jar in the maven release repository?

You need to sort out the N&L files. The current N&L apply to the LARQ 
jar and are fine. For the with-dependencies jar you'll to put in 
different N&L files for the consolidated set of dependences as you now 
redistributing other binaries as well as Jena code.

See Fuseki ... but that is only one way of doing it and I am not saying 
that it is the right for LARQ.

	Andy

Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)

[Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>]

Hi Andy

Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 22/03/12 18:28, Paolo Castagna wrote:
> ...
> 
>> LARQ isn't distributed as a binary .zip distribution to be used by
>> non developers. I removed the shell scripts, now mvn package will
>> create a one jar which can be used to run commands easily.
> 
> I tried mvn package and it puts the with-dependencies in target.Am I
> right in assuming that means for releases from now there'll also be a
> with-dependencies.jar in the maven release repository?
> 
> You need to sort out the N&L files. The current N&L apply to the LARQ
> jar and are fine. For the with-dependencies jar you'll to put in
> different N&L files for the consolidated set of dependences as you now
> redistributing other binaries as well as Jena code.

Good point.

Actually, another option would be to provide a way to generate the
with-dependencies.jar but not publish that in the Maven repository.

Shell scripts were broken (my fault) and nobody complained. :-)

> 
> See Fuseki ... but that is only one way of doing it and I am not saying
> that it is the right for LARQ.

Yep.

Paolo

> 
>     Andy