You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/08/15 01:23:38 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-3797) QJM: add segment txid as a parameter
to journal() RPC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13434626#comment-13434626 ]
Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-3797:
--------------------------------------
Patch looks pretty good to me. One question: have you considered adding a test case that ensures that a JN which experiences this scenario will return to participating in the quorum after the next finalize/new segment?
Nit: looks like the method comment for testMissFinalizeAndNextStart got messed up a little bit: "+ * */"
> QJM: add segment txid as a parameter to journal() RPC
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-3797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3797
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ha
> Affects Versions: QuorumJournalManager (HDFS-3077)
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Todd Lipcon
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: hdfs-3797.txt
>
>
> During fault testing of QJM, I saw the following issue:
> 1) NN sends txn 5 to JN
> 2) NN gets partitioned from JN while JN remains up. The next two RPCs are missed while the partition has happened:
> 2a) finalizeSegment(1-5)
> 2b) startSegment(6)
> 3) NN sends txn 6 to JN
> This caused one of the JNs to end up with a segment 1-10 while the others had two segments; 1-5 and 6-10. This broke some invariants of the QJM protocol and prevented the recovery protocol from running properly.
> This can be addressed on the client side by HDFS-3726, which would cause the NN to not send the RPC in #3. But it makes sense to also add an extra safety check here on the server side: with every journal() call, we can send the segment's txid. Then if the JN and the client get "out of sync", the JN can reject the RPCs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira