You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com> on 2018/11/26 16:36:43 UTC
Storm 2.0.0 release?
Hi devs,
Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
could happen?
Thanks
Julien
--
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
#digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com>.
It will be great if we can also release *1.2*.x along with this.
Best Regards
Saurabh Kumar Mimani
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 9:01 PM Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
avermeerbergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 14:12, Kishorkumar Patil
> <kp...@oath.com.invalid> a écrit :
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoessing@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> > > govindappumenon@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <
> ethanopensource@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 on this
> > > >
> > > > Ethan Li
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Taylor
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <
> mimani.saurabh@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no
> blockers?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best Regards
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > > stigdoessing@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <
> > > bobby@apache.org
> > > > >:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
> > > > >>> hopefully,
> > > > >>>> we can get a release out soon.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Bobby
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have
> been
> > > > heads
> > > > >>>> down
> > > > >>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond
> to
> > > the
> > > > >>>> JIRA.
> > > > >>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Bobby
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > > >>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > > >>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > > >>>>> regarding
> > > > >>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was
> going
> > > > with
> > > > >>>> it,
> > > > >>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> > > > >>> waiting
> > > > >>>>> for
> > > > >>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same
> > > code.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > > >>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > >>>> (STORM-3290)
> > > > >>>>>> is
> > > > >>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> (STORM-3276)
> > > > >>> is
> > > > >>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
> > > > >>> STORM-3279)
> > > > >>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 -
> (STORM-2720)
> > > > >>>>> seems a
> > > > >>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> -roshan
> > > > >>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> > > > >>> Døssing
> > > > >>>> <
> > > > >>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> I would like to get at least
> > > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > >>>>>>> (breaking changes) and
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > >>>>>>> (regression) in.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're
> in a
> > > > >>>> hurry
> > > > >>>>>> they
> > > > >>>>>>> could go in the next release.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > >>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any
> idea of
> > > > >>>> when
> > > > >>>>>> it
> > > > >>>>>>>> could happen?
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Julien
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > >>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > -Kishor
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Alexandre Vermeerbergen <av...@gmail.com>.
+1
Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 14:12, Kishorkumar Patil
<kp...@oath.com.invalid> a écrit :
>
> +1
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> > govindappumenon@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <ethanopensource@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 on this
> > >
> > > Ethan Li
> > >
> > > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > -Taylor
> > > >
> > > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Best Regards
> > > >>
> > > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > stigdoessing@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <
> > bobby@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
> > > >>> hopefully,
> > > >>>> we can get a release out soon.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Bobby
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been
> > > heads
> > > >>>> down
> > > >>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to
> > the
> > > >>>> JIRA.
> > > >>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Bobby
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > >>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > >>>>> regarding
> > > >>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going
> > > with
> > > >>>> it,
> > > >>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> > > >>> waiting
> > > >>>>> for
> > > >>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same
> > code.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > >>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > >>>> (STORM-3290)
> > > >>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> > > >>> is
> > > >>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
> > > >>> STORM-3279)
> > > >>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
> > > >>>>> seems a
> > > >>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> -roshan
> > > >>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> > > >>> Døssing
> > > >>>> <
> > > >>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I would like to get at least
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > >>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > >>>>>>> (regression) in.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> > > >>>> hurry
> > > >>>>>> they
> > > >>>>>>> could go in the next release.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > >>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> > > >>>> when
> > > >>>>>> it
> > > >>>>>>>> could happen?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Julien
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > >>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > >>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> --
> -Kishor
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Kishorkumar Patil <kp...@oath.com.INVALID>.
+1
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> govindappumenon@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <ethanopensource@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 on this
> >
> > Ethan Li
> >
> > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> > >
> > > -Taylor
> > >
> > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards
> > >>
> > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoessing@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> > >>>
> > >>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <
> bobby@apache.org
> > >:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
> > >>> hopefully,
> > >>>> we can get a release out soon.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Bobby
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been
> > heads
> > >>>> down
> > >>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to
> the
> > >>>> JIRA.
> > >>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Bobby
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > >>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > >>>>> regarding
> > >>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going
> > with
> > >>>> it,
> > >>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> > >>> waiting
> > >>>>> for
> > >>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same
> code.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > >>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > >>>> (STORM-3290)
> > >>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> > >>> is
> > >>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
> > >>> STORM-3279)
> > >>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
> > >>>>> seems a
> > >>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -roshan
> > >>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> > >>> Døssing
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I would like to get at least
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > >>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > >>>>>>> (regression) in.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> > >>>> hurry
> > >>>>>> they
> > >>>>>>> could go in the next release.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > >>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> > >>>> when
> > >>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>> could happen?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Julien
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > >>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
>
--
-Kishor
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
+1
Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
govindappumenon@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <et...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 on this
>
> Ethan Li
>
> > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >>
> >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoessing@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
> >>>
> >>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bobby@apache.org
> >:
> >>>>
> >>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
> >>> hopefully,
> >>>> we can get a release out soon.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Bobby
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been
> heads
> >>>> down
> >>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
> >>>> JIRA.
> >>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bobby
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> >>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> >>>>> regarding
> >>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going
> with
> >>>> it,
> >>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> >>> waiting
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> >>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> >>>> (STORM-3290)
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> >>> is
> >>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
> >>> STORM-3279)
> >>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
> >>>>> seems a
> >>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -roshan
> >>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> >>> Døssing
> >>>> <
> >>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would like to get at least
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> >>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> >>>>>>> (regression) in.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> >>>> hurry
> >>>>>> they
> >>>>>>> could go in the next release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> >>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> >>>> when
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> could happen?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Julien
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> >>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Govind Menon <go...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
+1
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <et...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 on this
Ethan Li
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
stigdoessing@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>>
>>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
>>>> we can get a release out soon.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
>>>> down
>>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
>>>> JIRA.
>>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobby
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
>>>>> regarding
>>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
>>>> it,
>>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
>>>>> for
>>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>> (STORM-3290)
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
>>>>> seems a
>>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -roshan
>>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
>>>> <
>>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to get at least
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>>>>>> (regression) in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>>>> hurry
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> could go in the next release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>>>> when
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> could happen?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Roshan Naik <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <et...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 on this
Ethan Li
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>>
>>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
>>>> we can get a release out soon.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
>>>> down
>>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
>>>> JIRA.
>>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobby
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
>>>>> regarding
>>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
>>>> it,
>>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
>>>>> for
>>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>> (STORM-3290)
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
>>>>> seems a
>>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -roshan
>>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
>>>> <
>>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to get at least
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>>>>>> (regression) in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>>>> hurry
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> could go in the next release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>>>> when
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> could happen?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Ethan Li <et...@gmail.com>.
+1 on this
Ethan Li
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>>
>>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
>>>> we can get a release out soon.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
>>>> down
>>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
>>>> JIRA.
>>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobby
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
>>>>> regarding
>>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
>>>> it,
>>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
>>>>> for
>>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>> (STORM-3290)
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
>>>>> seems a
>>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -roshan
>>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
>>>> <
>>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to get at least
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>>>>>> (regression) in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>>>> hurry
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> could go in the next release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>>>> when
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> could happen?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
-Taylor
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>
>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
>> hopefully,
>>> we can get a release out soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Bobby
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
>>> down
>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
>>> JIRA.
>>>> I am happy to let it go in.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
>>>> regarding
>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
>>> it,
>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>> waiting
>>>> for
>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>>>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (STORM-3290)
>>>>> is
>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>> is
>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
>> STORM-3279)
>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
>>>> seems a
>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -roshan
>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>> Døssing
>>> <
>>>>>> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to get at least
>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>>>>> (regression) in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>>> hurry
>>>>> they
>>>>>> could go in the next release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>>>>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>>> when
>>>>> it
>>>>>>> could happen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by saurabh mimani <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
Best Regards
Saurabh Kumar Mimani
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>
> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>:
>
> > I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and
> hopefully,
> > we can get a release out soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
> > down
> > > on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
> > JIRA.
> > > I am happy to let it go in.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bobby
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoessing@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > regarding
> > > > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
> > it,
> > > > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > >
> > > > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> waiting
> > > for
> > > > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> > > >
> > > > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > > <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> > > >
> > > > > Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > (STORM-3290)
> > > > is
> > > > > merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> is
> > > > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990,
> STORM-3279)
> > > > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > > > >
> > > > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
> > > seems a
> > > > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > > >
> > > > > -roshan
> > > > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> Døssing
> > <
> > > > > stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to get at least
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > > (regression) in.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> > hurry
> > > > they
> > > > > could go in the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > > lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> > when
> > > > it
> > > > > > could happen?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Julien
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>:
> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and hopefully,
> we can get a release out soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
> down
> > on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the
> JIRA.
> > I am happy to let it go in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoessing@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > regarding
> > > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
> it,
> > > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > >
> > > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting
> > for
> > > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> > >
> > > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> > >
> > > > Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> (STORM-3290)
> > > is
> > > > merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> > > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> > > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > > >
> > > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
> > seems a
> > > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > >
> > > > -roshan
> > > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing
> <
> > > > stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would like to get at least
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > (regression) in.
> > > >
> > > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> hurry
> > > they
> > > > could go in the next release.
> > > >
> > > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> when
> > > it
> > > > > could happen?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Julien
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > > #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>.
I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and hopefully,
we can get a release out soon.
Thanks,
Bobby
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads down
> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoessing@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
> > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
> > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> >
> > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting
> for
> > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> >
> > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290)
> > is
> > > merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > >
> > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
> > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > >
> > > -roshan
> > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > > stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > (regression) in.
> > >
> > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry
> > they
> > > could go in the next release.
> > >
> > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi devs,
> > > >
> > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when
> > it
> > > > could happen?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Julien
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > >
> > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>.
Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads down
on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the JIRA.
I am happy to let it go in.
Thanks,
Bobby
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) regarding
> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>
> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting for
> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>
> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
> > Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290)
> is
> > merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> > appears ready to be committed ?
> >
> > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720) seems a
> > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> >
> > -roshan
> > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > (regression) in.
> >
> > I think it would be nice to also get
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry
> they
> > could go in the next release.
> >
> > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi devs,
> > >
> > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when
> it
> > > could happen?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Julien
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > >
> > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> > >
> >
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) regarding
whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's waiting for
STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
<ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290) is
> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is
> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, STORM-3279)
> appears ready to be committed ?
>
> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720) seems a
> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>
> -roshan
> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoessing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> (regression) in.
>
> I think it would be nice to also get
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry they
> could go in the next release.
>
> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
> > could happen?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> >
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> >
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Roshan Naik <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290) is merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, STORM-3279) appears ready to be committed ?
and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720) seems a bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
-roshan
On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
(breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
(regression) in.
I think it would be nice to also get
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry they
could go in the next release.
Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> Hi devs,
>
> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
> could happen?
>
> Thanks
>
> Julien
>
> --
>
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>
Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
(breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
(regression) in.
I think it would be nice to also get
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a hurry they
could go in the next release.
Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>:
> Hi devs,
>
> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of when it
> could happen?
>
> Thanks
>
> Julien
>
> --
>
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>