You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2005/11/18 04:24:10 UTC

1.1: Release Early, Release Often

I'm curious what others thoughts are about releasing an alpha version of 
1.1 in the next week or so.  What are the items we want to make sure we 
get taken care of before we roll our first 1.1 distribution?

A couple of Definates:
1) Action Parameters
2) Portlet Preferences via derby
3) Fix assemble and deploy plugins (reports that they are broken?)
4) Build distributions via m2 (obviously)

What else?

I don't see any other reasons to postpone an alpha release. . . do you?



David


Re: 1.1: Release Early, Release Often

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> I'm curious what others thoughts are about releasing an alpha version of 
> 1.1 in the next week or so.  What are the items we want to make sure we 
> get taken care of before we roll our first 1.1 distribution?
> 
> A couple of Definates:
> 1) Action Parameters
> 2) Portlet Preferences via derby
> 3) Fix assemble and deploy plugins (reports that they are broken?)
> 4) Build distributions via m2 (obviously)
> 
> What else?
> 
> I don't see any other reasons to postpone an alpha release. . . do you?
> 
Unfortunately I didn't have time to look into 1.1 yet, I'm especially
interested in the assemble and deploy parts, but I will not have time in
the next weeks. So I can't say anything about problems etc. with the
current codebase in 1.1.

But I'm absolutely +1 for release early, release often and as long as we
call it alpha, everything can change :) So, +1

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/