You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Remko Popma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/24 23:39:58 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-1650) log4j2-core diet

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15603584#comment-15603584 ] 

Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1650 at 10/24/16 11:39 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

[~rmannibucau] what is your objective? Can you give us some insight into what you are trying to achieve by making the jar smaller? I'm trying to understand what the trade-offs are. 


was (Author: remkop@yahoo.com):
[~rmannibucau] what is your objective? Can you give us some insight into what you are trying to achieve by making the jar smaller?

> log4j2-core diet
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1650
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1650
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> Hello,
> log4j2 is ~1.3M. It is a lot to get started with logging and several parts are not mandatory to start and rarely needed all together like jackson, db, yaml (this one is not that big) etc...Also saw Generate class which is quite big but not sure it is needed at runtime and the annotation processor logic is never needed at runtime.
> Anyway, by comparison logback and log4j1 are ~500k so hopefully we could only pay the same price to get started with log4j2.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org