You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chukwa.apache.org by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/13 07:25:41 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE] Chukka 0.6.0 release candidate 4
Result of the vote:
1 +1 binding
0 -1
The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this information,
if there is no objections.
regards,
Eric
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Chukka 0.6.0 release candidate 4
Posted by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com>.
Both of you are correct. I can not use lazy consensus on package release.
We have a problem that we don't have enough PMC to vote. PMCs, please vote
or Chukwa will not see any future release, which can be a problem for the
community. Thank you for your assistance.
regards,
Eric
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Agree with Alan, please see "Votes on Package Releases" in [1]
>
> "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
> <http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval> -- i.e.
> at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there
> must be more positive than negative votes."
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
>
> > You cannot lazy consensus release votes.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am waiting for lazy consensus condition to pass. I will do the
> update
> > > after the weekend, if there is no objections.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> list@toolazydogs.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Don’t we need three binding votes?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Alan
> > >>
> > >> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Result of the vote:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1 +1 binding
> > >>> 0 -1
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this
> > >> information,
> > >>> if there is no objections.
> > >>>
> > >>> regards,
> > >>> Eric
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Chukka 0.6.0 release candidate 4
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Agree with Alan, please see "Votes on Package Releases" in [1]
"Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
<http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval> -- i.e.
at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there
must be more positive than negative votes."
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
> You cannot lazy consensus release votes.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am waiting for lazy consensus condition to pass. I will do the update
> > after the weekend, if there is no objections.
> >
> > regards,
> > Eric
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Don’t we need three binding votes?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Result of the vote:
> >>>
> >>> 1 +1 binding
> >>> 0 -1
> >>>
> >>> The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this
> >> information,
> >>> if there is no objections.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Eric
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Chukka 0.6.0 release candidate 4
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
You cannot lazy consensus release votes.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am waiting for lazy consensus condition to pass. I will do the update
> after the weekend, if there is no objections.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Don’t we need three binding votes?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Result of the vote:
>>>
>>> 1 +1 binding
>>> 0 -1
>>>
>>> The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this
>> information,
>>> if there is no objections.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Eric
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Chukka 0.6.0 release candidate 4
Posted by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com>.
I am waiting for lazy consensus condition to pass. I will do the update
after the weekend, if there is no objections.
regards,
Eric
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
> Don’t we need three binding votes?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Result of the vote:
> >
> > 1 +1 binding
> > 0 -1
> >
> > The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this
> information,
> > if there is no objections.
> >
> > regards,
> > Eric
>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Chukka 0.6.0 release candidate 4
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Don’t we need three binding votes?
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Result of the vote:
>
> 1 +1 binding
> 0 -1
>
> The vote passed. I will update the website and svn with this information,
> if there is no objections.
>
> regards,
> Eric