You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@bval.apache.org by Umesh Awasthi <um...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/11 12:56:22 UTC
Short circuiting constraints on a field (Bean validation)
I am wondering about way to enable short circuiting on constraint defined
at field levels.Say i have a field
*Code:*
private Integer phoneNumber;
and i have following validations on phoneNumber
*Code:*
@Digits(message="not.number")
@SecondValidation(value=10,message="my message")
private Integer phoneNumber;
In case i added alphanumeric value less than, i am getting both errors
1. Field should be number.
2. Second Message will also be displayed
Is there any way to tell BV API to not go for other validation if first one
failed (Short circuiting). In short i want to display only first error if
it failed and ignoring any other validation defined on that field / property
Is this feasible?
-
With Regards
Umesh Awasthi
http://www.travellingrants.com/
Re: Short circuiting constraints on a field (Bean validation)
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
If you like you could open a JIRA issue requesting this as a custom feature
in Apache BVal, and/or implement and contribute it.
Regards,
Matt
On Oct 12, 2013 7:10 AM, "Umesh Awasthi" <um...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Matt,
>
> But we can not control underlying API ?
> by control i mean by passing some kind of flag to BV and indicating that
> we want this type of error reporting.
>
> Though solution you mentioned will work but that is user dependent as user
> need to create those constraints.
> Since working on a plugin so i can not do it myself.
>
> Anyways Thanks for your valuable inputs.
>
> Thanks
> Umesh
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Umesh,
>> You should be able to do what you want by composing your two
>> constraints into a new "composite constraint." This is detailed in section
>> 2.3 of Bean Validation spec 1.0 . You can simply declare these constraints
>> on a new annotation that is itself annotated with @Constraint and
>> @ReportAsSingleViolation . The main caveat is that you won't get
>> individual error messages for these.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Umesh Awasthi <um...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I am wondering about way to enable short circuiting on constraint
>>> defined at field levels.Say i have a field
>>>
>>> *Code:*
>>> private Integer phoneNumber;
>>> and i have following validations on phoneNumber
>>> *Code:*
>>> @Digits(message="not.number")
>>> @SecondValidation(value=10,message="my message")
>>> private Integer phoneNumber;
>>>
>>>
>>> In case i added alphanumeric value less than, i am getting both errors
>>>
>>> 1. Field should be number.
>>> 2. Second Message will also be displayed
>>>
>>> Is there any way to tell BV API to not go for other validation if first
>>> one failed (Short circuiting). In short i want to display only first error
>>> if it failed and ignoring any other validation defined on that field /
>>> property
>>>
>>> Is this feasible?
>>>
>>> -
>>> With Regards
>>> Umesh Awasthi
>>> http://www.travellingrants.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With Regards
> Umesh Awasthi
> http://www.travellingrants.com/
>
>
>
Re: Short circuiting constraints on a field (Bean validation)
Posted by Umesh Awasthi <um...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Matt,
But we can not control underlying API ?
by control i mean by passing some kind of flag to BV and indicating that we
want this type of error reporting.
Though solution you mentioned will work but that is user dependent as user
need to create those constraints.
Since working on a plugin so i can not do it myself.
Anyways Thanks for your valuable inputs.
Thanks
Umesh
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Umesh,
> You should be able to do what you want by composing your two constraints
> into a new "composite constraint." This is detailed in section 2.3 of Bean
> Validation spec 1.0 . You can simply declare these constraints on a new
> annotation that is itself annotated with @Constraint and
> @ReportAsSingleViolation . The main caveat is that you won't get
> individual error messages for these.
>
> HTH,
> Matt
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Umesh Awasthi <um...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am wondering about way to enable short circuiting on constraint defined
>> at field levels.Say i have a field
>>
>> *Code:*
>> private Integer phoneNumber;
>> and i have following validations on phoneNumber
>> *Code:*
>> @Digits(message="not.number")
>> @SecondValidation(value=10,message="my message")
>> private Integer phoneNumber;
>>
>>
>> In case i added alphanumeric value less than, i am getting both errors
>>
>> 1. Field should be number.
>> 2. Second Message will also be displayed
>>
>> Is there any way to tell BV API to not go for other validation if first
>> one failed (Short circuiting). In short i want to display only first error
>> if it failed and ignoring any other validation defined on that field /
>> property
>>
>> Is this feasible?
>>
>> -
>> With Regards
>> Umesh Awasthi
>> http://www.travellingrants.com/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
With Regards
Umesh Awasthi
http://www.travellingrants.com/
Re: Short circuiting constraints on a field (Bean validation)
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hello Umesh,
You should be able to do what you want by composing your two constraints
into a new "composite constraint." This is detailed in section 2.3 of Bean
Validation spec 1.0 . You can simply declare these constraints on a new
annotation that is itself annotated with @Constraint and
@ReportAsSingleViolation . The main caveat is that you won't get
individual error messages for these.
HTH,
Matt
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Umesh Awasthi <um...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I am wondering about way to enable short circuiting on constraint defined
> at field levels.Say i have a field
>
> *Code:*
> private Integer phoneNumber;
> and i have following validations on phoneNumber
> *Code:*
> @Digits(message="not.number")
> @SecondValidation(value=10,message="my message")
> private Integer phoneNumber;
>
>
> In case i added alphanumeric value less than, i am getting both errors
>
> 1. Field should be number.
> 2. Second Message will also be displayed
>
> Is there any way to tell BV API to not go for other validation if first
> one failed (Short circuiting). In short i want to display only first error
> if it failed and ignoring any other validation defined on that field /
> property
>
> Is this feasible?
>
> -
> With Regards
> Umesh Awasthi
> http://www.travellingrants.com/
>
>
>