You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to testers@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2005/11/08 18:19:24 UTC
21 days? Win32 1.3.34 candidate ready for testing
Folks,
I'll pull down Win32 binaries for 1.3.34 tonight, since it's been up at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
for the past three weeks and haven't seen three +1's yet. If we get three
votes to release this binary package, great. If not, I'll remove the links
from downloads.cgi on the httpd site, as well as the out-of-date 1.3.33 pkg.
Votes please
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: 21 days? Win32 1.3.34 candidate ready for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Andrew Shugg wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
>
>>>Is there a testing procedure that anyone uses?
>>
>>Are you familiar with http://httpd.apache.org/test/ ?
>
> Nope, but I am now ... I will try the perl-framework approach next time.
Just forwarning, runing perl-framework on Win32 is a non-trivial problem :)
Feel free to ping the list if you get stuck.
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: 21 days? Win32 1.3.34 candidate ready for testing
Posted by Andrew Shugg <an...@neep.com.au>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
> >Is there a testing procedure that anyone uses?
>
> Are you familiar with http://httpd.apache.org/test/ ?
Nope, but I am now ... I will try the perl-framework approach next time.
Cheers
Andrew.
--
Andrew Shugg <an...@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there? Well I'd like to meet him. I could do with a good laugh."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: 21 days? Win32 1.3.34 candidate ready for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Andrew Shugg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:24AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> The only problem I
> could find was that the manual/misc directory was empty, so references
> to (e.g.) the FAQ were broken. This meant that the FAQ shortcut
> installed by the installer did not work, which is a high-visibility bug.
Andrew thank you for the report, I'll investigate, and if appropriate, just
reroll this package in the next few days with the missing tree.
> Is there a testing procedure that anyone uses?
Are you familiar with http://httpd.apache.org/test/ ?
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: 21 days? Win32 1.3.34 candidate ready for testing
Posted by Andrew Shugg <an...@neep.com.au>.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:19:24AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'll pull down Win32 binaries for 1.3.34 tonight, since it's been up
> at
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> for the past three weeks and haven't seen three +1's yet. If we get
> three votes to release this binary package, great. If not, I'll
> remove the links from downloads.cgi on the httpd site, as well as the
> out-of-date 1.3.33 pkg.
>
> Votes please
>
> Bill
Bill,
I downloaded the 3 win32 installers last week and tried them on my
Windows XP sp2 desktop at work. Seemed to work fine, but I did not
submit them to any particularly exotic testing. The only problem I
could find was that the manual/misc directory was empty, so references
to (e.g.) the FAQ were broken. This meant that the FAQ shortcut
installed by the installer did not work, which is a high-visibility bug.
Had the same problem with all three packaged versions of 1.3.34 so I
guess the misc directory was just missed somehow?
Is there a testing procedure that anyone uses?
Cheers,
Andrew S.
--
Andrew Shugg <an...@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there? Well I'd like to meet him. I could do with a good laugh."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org