You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> on 2006/04/13 05:21:51 UTC
Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Hi folks,
I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is very active
with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good addition
to Lucene.Net
This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice if this
not it.
Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html -- there are
some paper work which you have to take care of.
Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so, my vote
is +1.
Regards,
-- George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>.
I just signed and faxed a CLA to the ASF. I also previously discussed my
participation with the ASF with my company, and all is clear with that as
well (no corporate CLA needed, btw.)
Looking forward to getting going....
-- jeff
On 4/12/06, Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>
> I'm +1 as well. Since the paperwork and administrative overhead
> takes a while, I encourage Jeff to get the ball rolling submitting a
> CLA right away, as we discuss (if needed) the process and acceptance
> of Jeff as a Lucene.Net committer. Should be no problem. We need
> more committers on Lucene.Net and it'd be silly to get in the way of
> anyone that is eager to contribute quality.
>
> Erik
>
> On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:21 PM, George Aroush wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is
> > very active
> > with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good
> > addition
> > to Lucene.Net
> >
> > This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
> > regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice
> > if this
> > not it.
> >
> > Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
> > http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html --
> > there are
> > some paper work which you have to take care of.
> >
> > Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so,
> > my vote
> > is +1.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George
>
>
RE: Lucene.Net
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Hi Erik and all,
Sure thing and the email archive is a good record to have; for example, see
this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg08663.html
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 10:49 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
George,
This is good information to keep around moving forward, so thanks for
providing that. It will be a factor in making sure the IP rights are free
and clear in order for Lucene.Net to graduate from incubation.
Erik
On Apr 17, 2006, at 9:47 AM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Wiki: Done. I now have an account and did a quick test to edit the
> page.
> Everything works.
>
> Lucene.Net History: Yes, the release of 1.3-rc3 as DotLucene was
> nothing but a re-packaging of what Pasha removed from SourceForge.net.
> Everything released after 1.3-rc3 was done by me from the ground up.
> I did not take anything from Pasha's 1.3-rc3 release other then
> examining it to fix some issues (primarily with the file
> StandardTokenizerTokenManager.java). Once I had my first 1.4 release,
> I never had to look back at 1.3's code base.
>
> I hope this helps, if not let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
>
> Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
> desired.
>
> I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3- rc3,
> that was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha - was
> any of that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by you?
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2006, at 10:25 PM, George Aroush wrote:
>
>> Hi Noel,
>>
>> I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
>> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
>>
>> In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it
>> went:
>> May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was
>> released by Pasha Bizhan Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha
>> Bizhan Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases
>> were removed from SourceForge.net Sep 2004: A new project called
>> DotLucene was created on SourceForge.net Sep 2004: I re-released
>> Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name DotLucene on
>> SourceForge.net Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me
>> Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was
>> released by me Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me Feb 2005:
>> 1.4.3-final was released by me May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me
>> Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me
>>
>> As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not in
>> ASF terms so I will say "no" to him.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Lucene.Net
>>
>> George,
>>
>> Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see examples
>> in the e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
>>
>> If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of
>> Lucene.Net.
>> It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version
>> becoming DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is
>> what came to here, according to the status file, but you seem to
>> indicate that not all of the participants have come?
>>
>> I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for DotLucene
>> set up by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the
>> site. :-)
>>
>> And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
>>
>> --- Noel
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>>
>>
>> Hi Nole,
>>
>> Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from me?
>> If so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms
>> that I have to fill.
>>
>> The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please
>> advice.)
>> At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no
>> longer be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net
>> beside the announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
>>
>> http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for DotLucene
>> set up by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if
>> he wants to contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which
>> is found
>> here:
>> http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
>>
>> "I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a
>> link back to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g.
>> <p>Contributed by
>> <a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
>>
>> I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to
>> ask for.
>> In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
>> acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and maintain
>> the documentations myself.
>>
>> As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case
>> with 1.2.
>> However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that
>> Lucene.Net is on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any
>> more.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>>
>> Erik,
>>
>> I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for inclusion
>> this month.
>>
>> For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is
>> from the DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with
>> IP clearance?
>> And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as
>> the project's web site soon?
>>
>> I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
>> (http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue I
>> have with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE
>> Lucene for .net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
>>
>> --- Noel
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Lucene.Net
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
George,
This is good information to keep around moving forward, so thanks for
providing that. It will be a factor in making sure the IP rights are
free and clear in order for Lucene.Net to graduate from incubation.
Erik
On Apr 17, 2006, at 9:47 AM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Wiki: Done. I now have an account and did a quick test to edit the
> page.
> Everything works.
>
> Lucene.Net History: Yes, the release of 1.3-rc3 as DotLucene was
> nothing but
> a re-packaging of what Pasha removed from SourceForge.net. Everything
> released after 1.3-rc3 was done by me from the ground up. I did
> not take
> anything from Pasha's 1.3-rc3 release other then examining it to
> fix some
> issues (primarily with the file
> StandardTokenizerTokenManager.java). Once I
> had my first 1.4 release, I never had to look back at 1.3's code base.
>
> I hope this helps, if not let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
>
> Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
> desired.
>
> I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-
> rc3, that
> was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha - was
> any of
> that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by you?
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2006, at 10:25 PM, George Aroush wrote:
>
>> Hi Noel,
>>
>> I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
>> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
>>
>> In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it
>> went:
>> May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan
>> Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan
>> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha Bizhan
>> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases were
>> removed
>> from SourceForge.net
>> Sep 2004: A new project called DotLucene was created on
>> SourceForge.net
>> Sep 2004: I re-released Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name
>> DotLucene
>> on SourceForge.net
>> Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me
>> Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me
>> Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was released by me
>> Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me
>> Feb 2005: 1.4.3-final was released by me
>> May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me
>> Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me
>>
>> As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not
>> in ASF
>> terms so I will say "no" to him.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Lucene.Net
>>
>> George,
>>
>> Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see
>> examples in the
>> e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
>>
>> If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of
>> Lucene.Net.
>> It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version
>> becoming
>> DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is what
>> came to
>> here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that
>> not all of
>> the participants have come?
>>
>> I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for
>> DotLucene set up
>> by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the
>> site. :-)
>>
>> And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
>>
>> --- Noel
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>>
>>
>> Hi Nole,
>>
>> Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from
>> me? If
>> so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms
>> that I
>> have to fill.
>>
>> The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please
>> advice.)
>> At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no
>> longer
>> be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
>> announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
>>
>> http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for
>> DotLucene set up
>> by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he
>> wants to
>> contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found
>> here:
>> http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
>>
>> "I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a
>> link back
>> to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g.
>> <p>Contributed by
>> <a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
>>
>> I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to
>> ask for.
>> In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
>> acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and
>> maintain the
>> documentations myself.
>>
>> As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case
>> with 1.2.
>> However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that
>> Lucene.Net is
>> on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>>
>> Erik,
>>
>> I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for
>> inclusion this
>> month.
>>
>> For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is
>> from the
>> DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP
>> clearance?
>> And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as
>> the
>> project's web site soon?
>>
>> I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
>> (http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue
>> I have
>> with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE
>> Lucene for
>> .net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
>>
>> --- Noel
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Lucene.Net
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Hi Erik,
Wiki: Done. I now have an account and did a quick test to edit the page.
Everything works.
Lucene.Net History: Yes, the release of 1.3-rc3 as DotLucene was nothing but
a re-packaging of what Pasha removed from SourceForge.net. Everything
released after 1.3-rc3 was done by me from the ground up. I did not take
anything from Pasha's 1.3-rc3 release other then examining it to fix some
issues (primarily with the file StandardTokenizerTokenManager.java). Once I
had my first 1.4 release, I never had to look back at 1.3's code base.
I hope this helps, if not let me know.
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as desired.
I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-rc3, that
was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha - was any of
that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by you?
Erik
On Apr 16, 2006, at 10:25 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
>
> In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it
> went:
> May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases were
> removed
> from SourceForge.net
> Sep 2004: A new project called DotLucene was created on
> SourceForge.net
> Sep 2004: I re-released Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name
> DotLucene
> on SourceForge.net
> Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me
> Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me
> Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was released by me
> Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me
> Feb 2005: 1.4.3-final was released by me
> May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me
> Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me
>
> As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not
> in ASF
> terms so I will say "no" to him.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Lucene.Net
>
> George,
>
> Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see
> examples in the
> e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
>
> If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of
> Lucene.Net.
> It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version
> becoming
> DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is what
> came to
> here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that
> not all of
> the participants have come?
>
> I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for
> DotLucene set up
> by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the
> site. :-)
>
> And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
>
> Hi Nole,
>
> Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from
> me? If
> so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms
> that I
> have to fill.
>
> The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please
> advice.)
> At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no
> longer
> be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
> announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
>
> http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for
> DotLucene set up
> by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he
> wants to
> contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found
> here:
> http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
>
> "I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a
> link back
> to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g.
> <p>Contributed by
> <a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
>
> I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to
> ask for.
> In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
> acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and
> maintain the
> documentations myself.
>
> As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case
> with 1.2.
> However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that
> Lucene.Net is
> on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
> Erik,
>
> I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for
> inclusion this
> month.
>
> For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is
> from the
> DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP
> clearance?
> And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as
> the
> project's web site soon?
>
> I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
> (http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue
> I have
> with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE
> Lucene for
> .net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Lucene.Net
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
desired.
I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-rc3,
that was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha -
was any of that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by
you?
Erik
On Apr 16, 2006, at 10:25 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
>
> In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it
> went:
> May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases were
> removed
> from SourceForge.net
> Sep 2004: A new project called DotLucene was created on
> SourceForge.net
> Sep 2004: I re-released Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name
> DotLucene
> on SourceForge.net
> Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me
> Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me
> Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was released by me
> Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me
> Feb 2005: 1.4.3-final was released by me
> May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me
> Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me
>
> As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not
> in ASF
> terms so I will say "no" to him.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Lucene.Net
>
> George,
>
> Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see
> examples in the
> e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
>
> If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of
> Lucene.Net.
> It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version
> becoming
> DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is what
> came to
> here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that
> not all of
> the participants have come?
>
> I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for
> DotLucene set up
> by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the
> site. :-)
>
> And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
>
> Hi Nole,
>
> Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from
> me? If
> so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms
> that I
> have to fill.
>
> The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please
> advice.)
> At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no
> longer
> be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
> announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
>
> http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for
> DotLucene set up
> by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he
> wants to
> contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found
> here:
> http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
>
> "I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a
> link back
> to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g.
> <p>Contributed by
> <a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
>
> I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to
> ask for.
> In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
> acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and
> maintain the
> documentations myself.
>
> As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case
> with 1.2.
> However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that
> Lucene.Net is
> on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
> Erik,
>
> I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for
> inclusion this
> month.
>
> For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is
> from the
> DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP
> clearance?
> And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as
> the
> project's web site soon?
>
> I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
> (http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue
> I have
> with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE
> Lucene for
> .net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Lucene.Net
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Hi Noel,
I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it went:
May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan
Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan
Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha Bizhan
Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases were removed
from SourceForge.net
Sep 2004: A new project called DotLucene was created on SourceForge.net
Sep 2004: I re-released Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name DotLucene
on SourceForge.net
Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me
Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me
Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was released by me
Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me
Feb 2005: 1.4.3-final was released by me
May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me
Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me
As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not in ASF
terms so I will say "no" to him.
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Lucene.Net
George,
Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see examples in the
e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of Lucene.Net.
It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version becoming
DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is what came to
here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that not all of
the participants have come?
I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for DotLucene set up
by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the site. :-)
And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Hi Nole,
Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from me? If
so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms that I
have to fill.
The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please advice.)
At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no longer
be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for DotLucene set up
by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he wants to
contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found here:
http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
"I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a link back
to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g. <p>Contributed by
<a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to ask for.
In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and maintain the
documentations myself.
As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case with 1.2.
However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that Lucene.Net is
on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Erik,
I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for inclusion this
month.
For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is from the
DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP clearance?
And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as the
project's web site soon?
I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
(http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue I have
with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE Lucene for
.net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Lucene.Net
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
George,
Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see examples in the
e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of Lucene.Net.
It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version becoming
DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is what came to
here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that not all of
the participants have come?
I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for DotLucene set up
by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the site. :-)
And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Hi Nole,
Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from me? If
so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms that I
have to fill.
The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please advice.)
At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no longer
be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for DotLucene set up
by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he wants to
contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found here:
http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
"I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a link back
to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g. <p>Contributed by
<a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to ask for.
In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and maintain the
documentations myself.
As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case with 1.2.
However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that Lucene.Net is
on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Erik,
I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for inclusion this
month.
For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is from the
DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP clearance?
And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as the
project's web site soon?
I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
(http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue I have
with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE Lucene for
.net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Hi Nole,
Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from me? If
so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms that I
have to fill.
The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please advice.)
At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no longer
be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for DotLucene set up
by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he wants to
contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found here:
http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was:
"I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a link back
to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g. <p>Contributed by
<a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to ask for.
In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and maintain the
documentations myself.
As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case with 1.2.
However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that Lucene.Net is
on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Erik,
I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for inclusion this
month.
For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is from the
DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP clearance?
And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as the
project's web site soon?
I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
(http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue I have
with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE Lucene for
.net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Erik,
I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for inclusion this
month.
For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is from the
DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP clearance?
And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as the
project's web site soon?
I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
(http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue I have
with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE Lucene for
.net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
I'm +1 as well. Since the paperwork and administrative overhead
takes a while, I encourage Jeff to get the ball rolling submitting a
CLA right away, as we discuss (if needed) the process and acceptance
of Jeff as a Lucene.Net committer. Should be no problem. We need
more committers on Lucene.Net and it'd be silly to get in the way of
anyone that is eager to contribute quality.
Erik
On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:21 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is
> very active
> with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good
> addition
> to Lucene.Net
>
> This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
> regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice
> if this
> not it.
>
> Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
> http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html --
> there are
> some paper work which you have to take care of.
>
> Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so,
> my vote
> is +1.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Doug Cutting wrote:
> The site is down, but here's my personal recollection of how committers
> are added:
>
> 1. A PMC member starts discussion with on project PMC list (or
> incubator-general for incubating projects). One week should be allowed
> for discussion of the nomination.
Not incubator-general. Should be on the incubating
project's PPMC private list.
> 2. The nominator should then call a vote with a VOTE message on the same
> mailing list. One week should be allowed for votes. At least three +1
> votes and no -1 votes are required.
>
> 3. The prospective committer should file an ICLA. Their employer should
> file a CCLA if they will be employed to work on Apache projects and
> their employer does not already specifically permit that (and most
> employment agreements specifically forbid this sort of thing).
>
> 4. Once the CLA(s) are on file, the nominator should send a message to
> root@apache.org asking for an account to be created. The message should
> provide a desired username, forwarding email address and cite the vote
> in the mailing list archives.
Essentially, yes. Also the relevant PMC needs to be Cc.
For incubating projects, this is the project's
PPMC and also the Incubator PMC.
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/newcommitters.html
> 5. Once the account is created, the nominator should email the chair of
> the project or its PMC, asking that Subversion access be given.
6. Follow up with the new committer and ensure that
they know about the guidelines and svnpasswd and stuff.
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
http://www.apache.org/dev/#committers
-David
> That's my take. I think Jeff is at 4, although the voting was rather
> casual (no VOTE-subject messages). I am happy to give Jeff Subversion
> access (5), but I cannot do that until he has an account (4) and I know
> the name of that account.
>
> Doug
>
> Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >I believe the next step is for you to be added to those with write
> >rights on that svn tree. I'm not sure who's in charge of that
> >particular piece.... if it is under Lucene then Doug can do it,
> >otherwise the incubator PMC can do it somehow.
> >
> > Erik
> >
> >
> >On May 10, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Rodenburg wrote:
> >
> >>What's the next step for getting ratified as a committer?
> >>
> >>On 5/10/06, Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>You are there:
> >>>
> >>>http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
> >>>
> >>>-Yonik
> >>>
> >>>On 5/10/06, Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> I submitted the paperwork to the ASF last month but haven't heard
> >>>anything
> >>>> as of yet. Is there a way I can confirm what's happening
> >>>regarding my
> >>>> status as a committer for the Lucene.Net project?
> >>>>
> >>>> cheers,
> >>>> jeff r.
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
The site is down, but here's my personal recollection of how committers
are added:
1. A PMC member starts discussion with on project PMC list (or
incubator-general for incubating projects). One week should be allowed
for discussion of the nomination.
2. The nominator should then call a vote with a VOTE message on the same
mailing list. One week should be allowed for votes. At least three +1
votes and no -1 votes are required.
3. The prospective committer should file an ICLA. Their employer should
file a CCLA if they will be employed to work on Apache projects and
their employer does not already specifically permit that (and most
employment agreements specifically forbid this sort of thing).
4. Once the CLA(s) are on file, the nominator should send a message to
root@apache.org asking for an account to be created. The message should
provide a desired username, forwarding email address and cite the vote
in the mailing list archives.
5. Once the account is created, the nominator should email the chair of
the project or its PMC, asking that Subversion access be given.
That's my take. I think Jeff is at 4, although the voting was rather
casual (no VOTE-subject messages). I am happy to give Jeff Subversion
access (5), but I cannot do that until he has an account (4) and I know
the name of that account.
Doug
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I believe the next step is for you to be added to those with write
> rights on that svn tree. I'm not sure who's in charge of that
> particular piece.... if it is under Lucene then Doug can do it,
> otherwise the incubator PMC can do it somehow.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On May 10, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Rodenburg wrote:
>
>> What's the next step for getting ratified as a committer?
>>
>> On 5/10/06, Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You are there:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>>
>>> On 5/10/06, Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I submitted the paperwork to the ASF last month but haven't heard
>>> anything
>>> > as of yet. Is there a way I can confirm what's happening
>>> regarding my
>>> > status as a committer for the Lucene.Net project?
>>> >
>>> > cheers,
>>> > jeff r.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
I believe the next step is for you to be added to those with write
rights on that svn tree. I'm not sure who's in charge of that
particular piece.... if it is under Lucene then Doug can do it,
otherwise the incubator PMC can do it somehow.
Erik
On May 10, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Rodenburg wrote:
> What's the next step for getting ratified as a committer?
>
> On 5/10/06, Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You are there:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>>
>> -Yonik
>>
>> On 5/10/06, Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I submitted the paperwork to the ASF last month but haven't heard
>> anything
>> > as of yet. Is there a way I can confirm what's happening
>> regarding my
>> > status as a committer for the Lucene.Net project?
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > jeff r.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>.
What's the next step for getting ratified as a committer?
On 5/10/06, Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
>
> -Yonik
>
> On 5/10/06, Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I submitted the paperwork to the ASF last month but haven't heard
> anything
> > as of yet. Is there a way I can confirm what's happening regarding my
> > status as a committer for the Lucene.Net project?
> >
> > cheers,
> > jeff r.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com>.
You are there:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
-Yonik
On 5/10/06, Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submitted the paperwork to the ASF last month but haven't heard anything
> as of yet. Is there a way I can confirm what's happening regarding my
> status as a committer for the Lucene.Net project?
>
> cheers,
> jeff r.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>.
I submitted the paperwork to the ASF last month but haven't heard anything
as of yet. Is there a way I can confirm what's happening regarding my
status as a committer for the Lucene.Net project?
cheers,
jeff r.
On 4/16/06, Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> You may want to check out
> http://incubator.apache.org/learn/newcommitters.html as a starting
> point. The if clause at the beginning of the document is key (in my
> opinion).
>
> Yoav
>
> On 4/16/06, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > I received an email from someone else asking to be a committer for
> > Lucene.Net at ASF. I don't know him so I can't speak to him. For Jeff,
> it
> > was easy, he is a very active at responding to questions at
> SourceForge.net
> > for DotLucene, so it's easy to approve Jeff.
> >
> > What's the normal process (if there is one) to bring new members on
> board?
> > For me, the person must prove him/her-self first.
> >
> > I am going to move this discussion over to:
> > lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 6:14 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
> >
> > +1 for Jeff, Lucene.Net needs him! ;)
> >
> > Otis
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>; Doug Cutting
> > <do...@cottrell-cutting.net>; Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:21:51 PM
> > Subject: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is very
> active
> > with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good
> addition
> > to Lucene.Net
> >
> > This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
> > regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice if
> this
> > not it.
> >
> > Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
> > http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html -- there
> are
> > some paper work which you have to take care of.
> >
> > Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so, my
> vote
> > is +1.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Yoav Shapira
> Nimalex LLC
> 1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
> Cambridge, MA, USA
> yoavs@computer.org / www.yoavshapira.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>.
You may want to check out
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/newcommitters.html as a starting
point. The if clause at the beginning of the document is key (in my
opinion).
Yoav
On 4/16/06, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> I received an email from someone else asking to be a committer for
> Lucene.Net at ASF. I don't know him so I can't speak to him. For Jeff, it
> was easy, he is a very active at responding to questions at SourceForge.net
> for DotLucene, so it's easy to approve Jeff.
>
> What's the normal process (if there is one) to bring new members on board?
> For me, the person must prove him/her-self first.
>
> I am going to move this discussion over to:
> lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 6:14 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
> +1 for Jeff, Lucene.Net needs him! ;)
>
> Otis
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>; Doug Cutting
> <do...@cottrell-cutting.net>; Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:21:51 PM
> Subject: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is very active
> with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good addition
> to Lucene.Net
>
> This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
> regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice if this
> not it.
>
> Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
> http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html -- there are
> some paper work which you have to take care of.
>
> Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so, my vote
> is +1.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Yoav Shapira
Nimalex LLC
1 Mifflin Place, Suite 310
Cambridge, MA, USA
yoavs@computer.org / www.yoavshapira.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
I received an email from someone else asking to be a committer for
Lucene.Net at ASF. I don't know him so I can't speak to him. For Jeff, it
was easy, he is a very active at responding to questions at SourceForge.net
for DotLucene, so it's easy to approve Jeff.
What's the normal process (if there is one) to bring new members on board?
For me, the person must prove him/her-self first.
I am going to move this discussion over to:
lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 6:14 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
+1 for Jeff, Lucene.Net needs him! ;)
Otis
----- Original Message ----
From: George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>; Doug Cutting
<do...@cottrell-cutting.net>; Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:21:51 PM
Subject: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Hi folks,
I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is very active
with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good addition
to Lucene.Net
This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice if this
not it.
Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html -- there are
some paper work which you have to take care of.
Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so, my vote
is +1.
Regards,
-- George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
I received an email from someone else asking to be a committer for
Lucene.Net at ASF. I don't know him so I can't speak to him. For Jeff, it
was easy, he is a very active at responding to questions at SourceForge.net
for DotLucene, so it's easy to approve Jeff.
What's the normal process (if there is one) to bring new members on board?
For me, the person must prove him/her-self first.
I am going to move this discussion over to:
lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 6:14 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
+1 for Jeff, Lucene.Net needs him! ;)
Otis
----- Original Message ----
From: George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>; Doug Cutting
<do...@cottrell-cutting.net>; Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:21:51 PM
Subject: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Hi folks,
I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is very active
with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good addition
to Lucene.Net
This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice if this
not it.
Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html -- there are
some paper work which you have to take care of.
Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so, my vote
is +1.
Regards,
-- George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
+1 for Jeff, Lucene.Net needs him! ;)
Otis
----- Original Message ----
From: George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>; Doug Cutting <do...@cottrell-cutting.net>; Jeff Rodenburg <je...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:21:51 PM
Subject: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
Hi folks,
I am looking to add Jeff to Lucene.Net as a committer. Jeff is very active
with Lucene.Net at SourceForge.net and I believe he will be a good addition
to Lucene.Net
This is what I found http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/pmc.html in
regards on how and what need to be done to add Jeff. Please advice if this
not it.
Jeff: To get you on board, please start here:
http://apache.planetmirror.com.au/dev/new-committers-guide.html -- there are
some paper work which you have to take care of.
Erik, Doug: I don't know if we really need to vote on this, if so, my vote
is +1.
Regards,
-- George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org