You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Colin Paul Adams <co...@colina.demon.co.uk> on 2004/07/18 09:06:31 UTC
Re: Bug in Cocoon Source Resolver (was Problems trying to implement a SourceFactory)
>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com> writes:
Colin> So, shall I raise a bug then?
Ralph> I certainly would.
OK.
But before I do, I'd better be certain which version from CVS I'm
running.
I checked out anonymously a few weeks ago. I thought it was cocoon 2.1
then (but I'm not certain).
But these days, when I do a build, the build directory has a
cocoon-2.0.0-dev sub-directory.
Yet CVS/Repository says cocoon-2.1
And Bugzilla offers me both Current CVS 2.1 and Current CVS 2.2
So I think it must be 2.2, but I'm not sure.
Maybe I should check out afresh from scratch. Will that guarentee 2.2?
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
Re: Bug in Cocoon Source Resolver (was Problems trying to implement a SourceFactory)
Posted by Colin Paul Adams <co...@colina.demon.co.uk>.
>>>>> "Joerg" == Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de> writes:
>> cocoon-2.0.0-dev sub-directory.
Joerg> This is cocoon-2.2.0-dev, isn't it?
Sorry, yes.
OK - I shall report it against Current CVS 2.1
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
Re: Bug in Cocoon Source Resolver (was Problems trying to implement
a SourceFactory)
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 18.07.2004 09:06, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>>>>>>"Ralph" == Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com> writes:
>
>
> Colin> So, shall I raise a bug then?
> Ralph> I certainly would.
>
> OK.
>
> But before I do, I'd better be certain which version from CVS I'm
> running.
>
> I checked out anonymously a few weeks ago. I thought it was cocoon 2.1
> then (but I'm not certain).
>
> But these days, when I do a build, the build directory has a
> cocoon-2.0.0-dev sub-directory.
This is cocoon-2.2.0-dev, isn't it?
> Yet CVS/Repository says cocoon-2.1
Yes, that's an irritating naming. We will fix it when moving to SVN.
> And Bugzilla offers me both Current CVS 2.1 and Current CVS 2.2
>
> So I think it must be 2.2, but I'm not sure.
Please use 2.1.
> Maybe I should check out afresh from scratch. Will that guarentee 2.2?
Don't use cocoon-2.2 repository as it contains "something completely
different": it was thought as 2.2, but we decided later to continue
development in cocoon-2.1 repository. The 2.2 repository had some
refactoring that were hopefully all backported to 2.1 repository and
additional a new container. cocoon-2.2 will be only a branch in SVN.
Joerg