You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com> on 2010/07/12 09:49:29 UTC
Re: svn commit: r963195 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./ STATUS docs/ docs/conf/mime.types modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c support/ab.c support/suexec.c
On 12 Jul 2010, at 07:57, rpluem@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Mon Jul 12 06:57:41 2010
> New Revision: 963195
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963195&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge r955966 from trunk:
>
> * Ensure that we only return a non fatal error if the request is idempotent
> and if we did not sent any request body so far.
Plus a lot of propchanges. Was that intentional, and if so shouldn't it have
been mentioned in the commit message?
--
Nick Kew
RE: svn commit: r963195 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./ STATUS docs/ docs/conf/mime.types modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c support/ab.c support/suexec.c
Posted by "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Kew
> Sent: Montag, 12. Juli 2010 09:49
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r963195 - in
> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./ STATUS docs/
> docs/conf/mime.types modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c
> support/ab.c support/suexec.c
>
>
> On 12 Jul 2010, at 07:57, rpluem@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: rpluem
> > Date: Mon Jul 12 06:57:41 2010
> > New Revision: 963195
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963195&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Merge r955966 from trunk:
> >
> > * Ensure that we only return a non fatal error if the
> request is idempotent
> > and if we did not sent any request body so far.
>
> Plus a lot of propchanges. Was that intentional, and if so
> shouldn't it have
> been mentioned in the commit message?
That always happens if you use svn merge with and svn client > 1.4.
I don't know why. Seems to be related to merge tracking.
Regards
Rüdiger