You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Ilia Soldis <s0...@tversu.ru> on 2002/10/04 17:01:50 UTC
[PATCH] misc changes
Am I right thinking that it is a common style - making all module's names as
links?
Re: [PATCH] misc changes
Posted by Astrid Kessler <ke...@kess-net.de>.
> You should think about this in a slightly different way: Every time a
> module name is mentioned, it should be in a <module>, because of the
> meaning applied to that tag. The fact that <module> results in a link
> is irrelevant. What is important is to consistently mark the different
> types of thing in the xml. The same goes for directives.
Uff, a few days ago I argued this way (in an other discussion). Now my own
words are beating me. :-) Well, you are right. I'll commit the patch.
Kess
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [PATCH] misc changes
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
Astrid Kessler wrote:
>>Am I right thinking that it is a common style - making all module's
>>names as links?
>
>
> Sure. If they are mentioned because of their funtionality. (imho)
> I omitted the link in this special case because the two modules are
> mentioned as examples.
>
> Which opinion do the others have? Should really every occurrence of a
> module be a link? Or should links be used ouf of the context?
You should think about this in a slightly different way: Every time a
module name is mentioned, it should be in a <module>, because of the
meaning applied to that tag. The fact that <module> results in a link
is irrelevant. What is important is to consistently mark the different
types of thing in the xml. The same goes for directives.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [PATCH] misc changes
Posted by Astrid Kessler <ke...@kess-net.de>.
> Am I right thinking that it is a common style - making all module's
> names as links?
Sure. If they are mentioned because of their funtionality. (imho)
I omitted the link in this special case because the two modules are
mentioned as examples.
Which opinion do the others have? Should really every occurrence of a
module be a link? Or should links be used ouf of the context?
Kess
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org