You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@juneau.apache.org by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> on 2017/07/06 15:56:24 UTC
Inappropriate use of slack channel
Hey Folks,
Really, discussions of release content Do Not Belong on the slack channel. Nothing time sensitive.
Craig
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 5:01 AM, Digest <sl...@digest.ai> wrote:
>
> Here’s your digest for today!
> #dev-juneau
> undefined: <@U4REN49DZ> no, marvin is a dumb script
> undefined: ok….no biggie.
> undefined: btw, can you follow up with Justin on the release issue? You may want to point him to where the release archive is.
> undefined: I’m positive he’s talking about that Atom sample code in the documentation. Here’s what he said in the original vote thread…
>
> ```
> - There's a number of "Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation" in the documentation you may want to update the year.
> ```
> I did a full search of that copyright in the entire source tree, and that’s the only place I found it.
> undefined: But even he’s saying no.
> Justin is meticulous about this sort of thing. Its always best to get direct answers from him.
> undefined: will do
>
>
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org
Re: Inappropriate use of slack channel
Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Here are the problems with slack as I see them:
Not inclusive. You have to be a member of the ASF Slack organization in order to read or post. It's very much like private@juneau in that regard.
Not transparent. Members can post anonymously. At least (see below) the digests have "undefined" as the author of some posts.
Not archived. We tried to get daily digests posted to the dev@juneau list. All I have seen from digests is a few teaser messages that are not attributed.
I have no problem with "jumping on slack" to have some real-time dialog. But it's not a substitute for the dev@juneau channel.
Craig
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:41 AM, James Bognar <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Perhaps we could get clarification of what is and what is not acceptable
> discussion on the Slack channel.
>
> I've been using it to broadcast screenshots of new features. It's
> information that's captured in the release notes. There simply isn't a
> good way to post screenshots to the list server, otherwise I would do that.
> (I'm sorry, but I'm NOT going to open a Jira ticket each time simply to
> attach screenshots to share links to images in an email message. That's
> just too crazy for me.)
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Craig,
>>
>> Respectfully, I disagree. Maybe the scope of the conversation isn't clear.
>>
>> I was reminding James to follow up with Justin RE this thread on
>> general@incubator.
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87a86e267ee921c7018493de7697fc
>> 05d458574edfd12050e8f73ff8@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:56 AM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Folks,
>>>
>>> Really, discussions of release content Do Not Belong on the slack
>> channel.
>>> Nothing time sensitive.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>> On Jul 6, 2017, at 5:01 AM, Digest <sl...@digest.ai> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here’s your digest for today!
>>>> #dev-juneau
>>>> undefined: <@U4REN49DZ> no, marvin is a dumb script
>>>> undefined: ok….no biggie.
>>>> undefined: btw, can you follow up with Justin on the release issue? You
>>> may want to point him to where the release archive is.
>>>> undefined: I’m positive he’s talking about that Atom sample code in the
>>> documentation. Here’s what he said in the original vote thread…
>>>>
>>>> ```
>>>> - There's a number of "Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation" in the
>>> documentation you may want to update the year.
>>>> ```
>>>> I did a full search of that copyright in the entire source tree, and
>>> that’s the only place I found it.
>>>> undefined: But even he’s saying no.
>>>> Justin is meticulous about this sort of thing. Its always best to get
>>> direct answers from him.
>>>> undefined: will do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> clr@apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
Re: Inappropriate use of slack channel
Posted by James Bognar <ja...@apache.org>.
Perhaps we could get clarification of what is and what is not acceptable
discussion on the Slack channel.
I've been using it to broadcast screenshots of new features. It's
information that's captured in the release notes. There simply isn't a
good way to post screenshots to the list server, otherwise I would do that.
(I'm sorry, but I'm NOT going to open a Jira ticket each time simply to
attach screenshots to share links to images in an email message. That's
just too crazy for me.)
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Respectfully, I disagree. Maybe the scope of the conversation isn't clear.
>
> I was reminding James to follow up with Justin RE this thread on
> general@incubator.
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87a86e267ee921c7018493de7697fc
> 05d458574edfd12050e8f73ff8@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:56 AM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Folks,
> >
> > Really, discussions of release content Do Not Belong on the slack
> channel.
> > Nothing time sensitive.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > > On Jul 6, 2017, at 5:01 AM, Digest <sl...@digest.ai> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here’s your digest for today!
> > > #dev-juneau
> > > undefined: <@U4REN49DZ> no, marvin is a dumb script
> > > undefined: ok….no biggie.
> > > undefined: btw, can you follow up with Justin on the release issue? You
> > may want to point him to where the release archive is.
> > > undefined: I’m positive he’s talking about that Atom sample code in the
> > documentation. Here’s what he said in the original vote thread…
> > >
> > > ```
> > > - There's a number of "Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation" in the
> > documentation you may want to update the year.
> > > ```
> > > I did a full search of that copyright in the entire source tree, and
> > that’s the only place I found it.
> > > undefined: But even he’s saying no.
> > > Justin is meticulous about this sort of thing. Its always best to get
> > direct answers from him.
> > > undefined: will do
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > clr@apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: Inappropriate use of slack channel
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Craig,
Respectfully, I disagree. Maybe the scope of the conversation isn't clear.
I was reminding James to follow up with Justin RE this thread on
general@incubator.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87a86e267ee921c7018493de7697fc05d458574edfd12050e8f73ff8@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
John
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:56 AM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> Really, discussions of release content Do Not Belong on the slack channel.
> Nothing time sensitive.
>
> Craig
>
> > On Jul 6, 2017, at 5:01 AM, Digest <sl...@digest.ai> wrote:
> >
> > Here’s your digest for today!
> > #dev-juneau
> > undefined: <@U4REN49DZ> no, marvin is a dumb script
> > undefined: ok….no biggie.
> > undefined: btw, can you follow up with Justin on the release issue? You
> may want to point him to where the release archive is.
> > undefined: I’m positive he’s talking about that Atom sample code in the
> documentation. Here’s what he said in the original vote thread…
> >
> > ```
> > - There's a number of "Copyright (c) 2016, Apache Foundation" in the
> documentation you may want to update the year.
> > ```
> > I did a full search of that copyright in the entire source tree, and
> that’s the only place I found it.
> > undefined: But even he’s saying no.
> > Justin is meticulous about this sort of thing. Its always best to get
> direct answers from him.
> > undefined: will do
> >
> >
>
> Craig L Russell
> clr@apache.org
>
>