You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> on 2013/07/12 21:02:23 UTC
[JS] Channel to be compatible with EventListener?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3785
Thoughts?
Re: [JS] Channel to be compatible with EventListener?
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Yep, sounds fine to me.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> I rescind my last comment. Given http://issues.cordova.io/3786 it
> looks like he wants compat at the event object on our custom events
> which makes sense. We should have this level of compatibility on our
> event code!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > Given the only reason is compatibility w/ the DOM spec, which this has
> > little to nothing to do with, I see no reason why we would add that
> > code.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3785
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
>
Re: [JS] Channel to be compatible with EventListener?
Posted by Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io>.
I rescind my last comment. Given http://issues.cordova.io/3786 it
looks like he wants compat at the event object on our custom events
which makes sense. We should have this level of compatibility on our
event code!
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> Given the only reason is compatibility w/ the DOM spec, which this has
> little to nothing to do with, I see no reason why we would add that
> code.
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3785
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
Re: [JS] Channel to be compatible with EventListener?
Posted by Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io>.
Given the only reason is compatibility w/ the DOM spec, which this has
little to nothing to do with, I see no reason why we would add that
code.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3785
>
> Thoughts?
>