You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@trafficserver.apache.org by James Peach <jp...@apache.org> on 2012/04/05 05:44:49 UTC
does anyone out there use traffic_shell
Hi all,
In various IRC conversations, the opinion has been expressed that no-one uses traffic_shell and that it should be removed. If people use it and like it, then we can work on improving it and fixing some bugs, otherwise I will propose that we deprecate it in 3.2 and remove it thereafter.
J
Re: does anyone out there use traffic_shell
Posted by "ming.zym@gmail.com" <mi...@gmail.com>.
YES, we do have some users interest in the traffic_shell, I think we can
hold back for sometime. :D
+ 1 for leave it there
在 2012-04-04三的 20:44 -0700，James Peach写道：
> Hi all,
>
> In various IRC conversations, the opinion has been expressed that no-one uses traffic_shell and that it should be removed. If people use it and like it, then we can work on improving it and fixing some bugs, otherwise I will propose that we deprecate it in 3.2 and remove it thereafter.
>
> J
--
zym, Zhao Yongming.
aka: yonghao @ taobao.com
Re: does anyone out there use traffic_shell
Posted by "ming.zym@gmail.com" <mi...@gmail.com>.
YES, we do have some users interest in the traffic_shell, I think we can
hold back for sometime. :D
+ 1 for leave it there
在 2012-04-04三的 20:44 -0700，James Peach写道：
> Hi all,
>
> In various IRC conversations, the opinion has been expressed that no-one uses traffic_shell and that it should be removed. If people use it and like it, then we can work on improving it and fixing some bugs, otherwise I will propose that we deprecate it in 3.2 and remove it thereafter.
>
> J
--
zym, Zhao Yongming.
aka: yonghao @ taobao.com