You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-dev@db.apache.org by Armin Waibel <ar...@apache.org> on 2006/07/23 02:13:21 UTC
[Vote] Cleanup SVN trunk
Hi all,
because of missing manpower and to concentrate work on OJB 1.x/2.x I
recommend to cleanup the source code.
The Prevlayer support is only a rudimentary alpha version of outdated
Prevlayer 1.x version (no work on this stuff for years).
The SODA support is only rudimentary (no work on this stuff for years).
The OTM is in early alpha status, work stopped many moth ago, many bugs,
slow performance, not ready for production.
The org.apache.ojb.jdori package contains the JDO1.0 support based on
jdori. Nobody worked on this stuff for many month. The implementation
has bugs and is not ready for production.
Vote:
-----
1. remove of Prevlayer support
2. remove the SODA support
3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from classpath),
then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff to OJB core. The
OTM concepts are very interesting.
4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
implementation).
If you do not agree, please tell us why and how many time you can spend
to work on this stuff.
[VOTE]
1. +1
2. +1
3. +1
4. +1
regards,
Armin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Cleanup SVN trunk
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>.
Armin Waibel wrote:
> 1. remove of Prevlayer support
>
> 2. remove the SODA support
>
> 3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from classpath),
> then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff to OJB core. The
> OTM concepts are very interesting.
>
> 4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
> documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
> implementation).
I've not used any of the above; +1 to all 4.
Vadim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Cleanup SVN trunk
Posted by Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org>.
On Jul 22, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Armin Waibel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> because of missing manpower
Hi!
> 1. remove of Prevlayer support
+1
> 2. remove the SODA support
+1
> 3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from
> classpath), then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff
> to OJB core. The OTM concepts are very interesting.
+1 The idea of OTM is still good, and we need something like that,
but the OTM is pretty much abandoned, I think.
> 4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
> documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
> implementation).
+1
-Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Cleanup SVN trunk
Posted by Thomas Dudziak <to...@gmail.com>.
On 7/22/06, Armin Waibel <ar...@apache.org> wrote:
> because of missing manpower and to concentrate work on OJB 1.x/2.x I
> recommend to cleanup the source code.
>
> The Prevlayer support is only a rudimentary alpha version of outdated
> Prevlayer 1.x version (no work on this stuff for years).
> The SODA support is only rudimentary (no work on this stuff for years).
> The OTM is in early alpha status, work stopped many moth ago, many bugs,
> slow performance, not ready for production.
> The org.apache.ojb.jdori package contains the JDO1.0 support based on
> jdori. Nobody worked on this stuff for many month. The implementation
> has bugs and is not ready for production.
>
> Vote:
> -----
>
> 1. remove of Prevlayer support
+1,
nobody is using this as it does not compile anyway and nobody
complained, so lets get rid of it
> 2. remove the SODA support
+1,
I never used it so I don't know how good it works, but I think nobody
uses it, so lets remove it
> 3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from classpath),
> then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff to OJB core. The
> OTM concepts are very interesting.
+1,
it makes integrating changes a lot harder, and nobody AFAIK uses it
> 4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
> documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
> implementation).
+0,
I"d like to see a JDO implementation perhaps using OJB, but this one
doesn't work. It will be available in SVN though
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
Re: [Vote] Cleanup SVN trunk
Posted by Leandro Saad <le...@gmail.com>.
On 7/22/06, Armin Waibel <ar...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Vote:
> -----
>
> 1. remove of Prevlayer support
+1
2. remove the SODA support
+1
3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from classpath),
> then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff to OJB core. The
> OTM concepts are very interesting.
+1
4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
> documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
> implementation).
0
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
CTO - InterBusiness Technologies
db.apache.org/ojb
guara-framework.sf.net
xingu.sf.net
Re: [Vote] Cleanup SVN trunk
Posted by Armin Waibel <ar...@apache.org>.
Result of the vote:
> 1. remove of Prevlayer support
>
> 2. remove the SODA support
>
> 3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from classpath),
> then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff to OJB core. The
> OTM concepts are very interesting.
>
> 4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
> documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
> implementation).
Leandro: +1 +1 +1 0
Tom: +1 +1 +1 +0
Brian: +1 +1 +1 +1
Vadim: +1 +1 +1 +1
Armin: +1 +1 +1 +1
The vote was accepted. I will do these changes (1-4) this week.
regards,
Armin
Armin Waibel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> because of missing manpower and to concentrate work on OJB 1.x/2.x I
> recommend to cleanup the source code.
>
> The Prevlayer support is only a rudimentary alpha version of outdated
> Prevlayer 1.x version (no work on this stuff for years).
> The SODA support is only rudimentary (no work on this stuff for years).
> The OTM is in early alpha status, work stopped many moth ago, many bugs,
> slow performance, not ready for production.
> The org.apache.ojb.jdori package contains the JDO1.0 support based on
> jdori. Nobody worked on this stuff for many month. The implementation
> has bugs and is not ready for production.
>
> Vote:
> -----
>
> 1. remove of Prevlayer support
>
> 2. remove the SODA support
>
> 3. move OTM sources to an archive directory (remove from classpath),
> then it's easy to search for and copy interesting stuff to OJB core. The
> OTM concepts are very interesting.
>
> 4. remove of the org.apache.ojb.jdori package in source, cleanup
> documentation, recommendation for JPOX (seems to be a solid JDO1/2
> implementation).
>
> If you do not agree, please tell us why and how many time you can spend
> to work on this stuff.
>
> [VOTE]
> 1. +1
> 2. +1
> 3. +1
> 4. +1
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org