You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Zoltan Haindrich (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/10/18 12:29:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-2632) Add hashCode and equals implementations to RexNode

Zoltan Haindrich created CALCITE-2632:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Add hashCode and equals implementations to RexNode 
                 Key: CALCITE-2632
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2632
             Project: Calcite
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Zoltan Haindrich
            Assignee: Zoltan Haindrich


Right now RexNode doesn't have any equals or hashCode functions; which makes it rely on the default implementation.

But when we are writing simplification logics we sometimes forget to use {{toString()}} during comparisions and may try to rely on pure equals:

* there is a [Set of RexNode-s|https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/5b16e23dff03e5eaed80642ae91e28ebf806e6b0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexSimplify.java#L1104] during {{AND}} simplification and in [RexUtil as well|https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/5b16e23dff03e5eaed80642ae91e28ebf806e6b0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexUtil.java#L321]
* I've by mistake just written rexNode.equals(otherRexNode) during the implementation of CALCITE-1413
* I've just bumped into the same thing...that [RexUtil.andNot|https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/5b16e23dff03e5eaed80642ae91e28ebf806e6b0/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexUtil.java#L1888] is also rely on it....and I think those comparisions go back a while (~3years at least) ; and a bug is not appeared from it because this comparision is in most cases false.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)