You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by ap...@gmail.com on 2022/03/08 08:28:36 UTC
[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Yishay Weiss
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
Hi
Yishay, I've already removed the ExternsJS related projects from the main branch and commented out all the references I've seen in the build and config files (I haven't removed them so I don't redo the work in the future).
I have detached the ExternsJS project to the "feature/ExternsJS" branch in the current state so I can continue working on it. (Alina, for you)
Then I did a build of the SDK with maven:
mvn clean install -DskipTests -P option-with-sass-compile,option-with-swf -Drat.skip=true
And also a build with ant:
ant all -Dbuild.noprompt=true -Drelease.target=true -Dskip-tests=true
Everything seems to work (I've compiled a couple of my projects fine).
As I said in the previous post, my work was in another branch "feature/ExternsJS_InspireTree" I got stuck with the pom creation for the maven compilation (in the main branch only the ant build was configured, I think I remember).
I hope I didn't forget anything.
Thx.
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 16:33
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
No need to apologize, we've all been there. These configurations are tricky.
Let me know when you've reverted it and I'll start a new release. No rush as I won't have time to do it tonight anyway.
From: Maria Jose Esteve<ma...@iest.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 5:16 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Yes. At the time, I created a branch but I don't remember why Alina uploaded her copy.
I'm going to try to remove it. I hope to do it correctly because I remember that we "wasted Harb's time" with the configuration and unit tests (sorry Harb).
I'm sorry, could you do it tonight?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 15:52
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Probably. Maria, maybe you should remove the project and put it in a branch until it is configured properly?
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:34 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Does this warrant another RC? (My gut says yes.)
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in the other thread.
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
>
> AFAIK, there's shouldn't be binaries in the release artifacts.
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
No need to apologize, we’ve all been there. These configurations are tricky.
Let me know when you’ve reverted it and I’ll start a new release. No rush as I won’t have time to do it tonight anyway.
From: Maria Jose Esteve<ma...@iest.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 5:16 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Yes. At the time, I created a branch but I don't remember why Alina uploaded her copy.
I'm going to try to remove it. I hope to do it correctly because I remember that we "wasted Harb's time" with the configuration and unit tests (sorry Harb).
I'm sorry, could you do it tonight?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 15:52
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Probably. Maria, maybe you should remove the project and put it in a branch until it is configured properly?
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:34 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Does this warrant another RC? (My gut says yes.)
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in the other thread.
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
>
> AFAIK, there's shouldn't be binaries in the release artifacts.
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
Yes. At the time, I created a branch but I don't remember why Alina uploaded her copy.
I'm going to try to remove it. I hope to do it correctly because I remember that we "wasted Harb's time" with the configuration and unit tests (sorry Harb).
I'm sorry, could you do it tonight?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 15:52
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Probably. Maria, maybe you should remove the project and put it in a branch until it is configured properly?
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:34 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Does this warrant another RC? (My gut says yes.)
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in the other thread.
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
>
> AFAIK, there's shouldn't be binaries in the release artifacts.
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Probably. Maria, maybe you should remove the project and put it in a branch until it is configured properly?
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:34 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Does this warrant another RC? (My gut says yes.)
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in the other thread.
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
>
> AFAIK, there’s shouldn’t be binaries in the release artifacts.
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Does this warrant another RC? (My gut says yes.)
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in the other thread.
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
>
> AFAIK, there’s shouldn’t be binaries in the release artifacts.
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in the other thread.
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Any clues why this file shows up?
B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
AFAIK, there’s shouldn’t be binaries in the release artifacts.
> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Any clues why this file shows up?
B /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
AFAIK, there’s shouldn’t be binaries in the release artifacts.
> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Below is the output for the methods I used to search for it, so I think we’re good.
C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs>gpg --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
gpg: data source: https://pgp.mit.edu:443
(1) Yishay Weiss <yi...@apache.org>
4096 bit RSA key E86EF353F54FE093, created: 2021-04-02, expires: 2026-04-02
Keys 1-1 of 1 for "F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093". Enter number(s), N)ext, or Q)uit > q
gpg: error searching keyserver: Operation cancelled
gpg: keyserver search failed: Operation cancelled
C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs>gpg --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys yishayw@apache.org
gpg: data source: https://pgp.mit.edu:443
(1) Yishay Weiss <yi...@apache.org>
4096 bit RSA key E86EF353F54FE093, created: 2021-04-02, expires: 2026-04-02
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 5:07 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
I searched using yishayw@apache.org and I still get nothing.
Dunno...
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:53 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> It’s published. It’s the same key that was used for the previous release. I think you just searched with the wrong email.
>
> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:54 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> I imported your key manually, and that worked, but you really should publish it. Manual imports shouldn’t be necessary.
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:33 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one after yours). You can search the fingerprint [2].
>>
>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>>
>> [2] F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>
>> From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:18 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
>>
>> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, that’s the one
>>>
>>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>>
>>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>>>
>>> Did you use a newer one?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I got an error here:
>>>>
>>>> check-sigs:
>>>>
>>>> gpg_check:
>>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>>
>>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Yishay Weiss
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I searched using yishayw@apache.org and I still get nothing.
Dunno...
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:53 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> It’s published. It’s the same key that was used for the previous release. I think you just searched with the wrong email.
>
> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:54 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> I imported your key manually, and that worked, but you really should publish it. Manual imports shouldn’t be necessary.
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:33 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one after yours). You can search the fingerprint [2].
>>
>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>>
>> [2] F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>
>> From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:18 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
>>
>> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, that’s the one
>>>
>>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>>
>>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>>>
>>> Did you use a newer one?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I got an error here:
>>>>
>>>> check-sigs:
>>>>
>>>> gpg_check:
>>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>>
>>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Yishay Weiss
>>
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
It’s published. It’s the same key that was used for the previous release. I think you just searched with the wrong email.
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:54 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
I imported your key manually, and that worked, but you really should publish it. Manual imports shouldn’t be necessary.
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:33 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one after yours). You can search the fingerprint [2].
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> [2] F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>
> From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:18 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
>
> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
>
>
>
> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, that’s the one
>>
>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>>
>> Did you use a newer one?
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I got an error here:
>>>
>>> check-sigs:
>>>
>>> gpg_check:
>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>
>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I imported your key manually, and that worked, but you really should publish it. Manual imports shouldn’t be necessary.
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:33 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one after yours). You can search the fingerprint [2].
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> [2] F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>
> From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:18 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
>
> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
>
>
>
> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, that’s the one
>>
>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>>
>> Did you use a newer one?
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I got an error here:
>>>
>>> check-sigs:
>>>
>>> gpg_check:
>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>
>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one after yours). You can search the fingerprint [2].
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
[2] F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:18 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, that’s the one
>
> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>
> Did you use a newer one?
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I got an error here:
>>
>> check-sigs:
>>
>> gpg_check:
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>
>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>
>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yishay Weiss
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Try yishayw@apache.org
________________________________
From: Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:49:22 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
gpg2 --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:18 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
>
> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
>
>
>
> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, that’s the one
>>
>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>>
>> Did you use a newer one?
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I got an error here:
>>>
>>> check-sigs:
>>>
>>> gpg_check:
>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>
>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
gpg2 --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys yishayjobs@hotmail.com
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:18 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
>
> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
>
>
>
> From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, that’s the one
>>
>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>>
>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>>
>> Did you use a newer one?
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I got an error here:
>>>
>>> check-sigs:
>>>
>>> gpg_check:
>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>
>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on April 13, 2020.
How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, that’s the one
>
> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>
> Did you use a newer one?
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I got an error here:
>>
>> check-sigs:
>>
>> gpg_check:
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>
>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>
>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yishay Weiss
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, that’s the one
>
> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
>
> Did you use a newer one?
>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I got an error here:
>>
>> check-sigs:
>>
>> gpg_check:
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>
>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>
>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yishay Weiss
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
No, that’s the one
From: Harbs<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
Did you use a newer one?
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I got an error here:
>
> check-sigs:
>
> gpg_check:
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current published key.
Did you use a newer one?
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I got an error here:
>
> check-sigs:
>
> gpg_check:
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
> gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>
>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I got an error here:
check-sigs:
gpg_check:
gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
gpg: using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyaleci@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss