You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@samza.apache.org by sy...@stevendyates.com on 2014/02/24 03:34:16 UTC
SAMZA-50 Attempt
Dear Dev's, does anyone have a problem if I take a stab at SAMZA-50
titled "Log both RMI and JMX ports in internal JMX server" .
Let me know if anyone else would prefer to take this on otherwise I
will give it a shot over the next few nights.
Cheers
Steven Yates
Re: SAMZA-50 Attempt
Posted by Chris Riccomini <cr...@linkedin.com>.
Hey Jakob,
Yea, I'd definitely +1 it as useful. I've already hit a case where it'd
have been nice to have in 0.7.0.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/25/14 10:48 AM, "Jakob Homan" <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yeah, I've got a quick patch somewhere I'll dig up. I wasn't sure if the
>feature would end up being useful, but we've got systems that are
>firewalled off here and it makes it easier to tunnel to them when
>necessary.
>
>
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Chris Riccomini
><cr...@linkedin.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey Steve,
>>
>> I think Jakob might already have a patch for this. Jakob, didn't we
>>have a
>> patch for this prior to 0.7.0 that got lost when we open sourced?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On 2/23/14 6:34 PM, "syates@stevendyates.com" <sy...@stevendyates.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Dear Dev's, does anyone have a problem if I take a stab at SAMZA-50
>> >titled "Log both RMI and JMX ports in internal JMX server" .
>> >
>> >Let me know if anyone else would prefer to take this on otherwise I
>> >will give it a shot over the next few nights.
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >Steven Yates
>> >
>>
>>
Re: SAMZA-50 Attempt
Posted by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, I've got a quick patch somewhere I'll dig up. I wasn't sure if the
feature would end up being useful, but we've got systems that are
firewalled off here and it makes it easier to tunnel to them when necessary.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Chris Riccomini
<cr...@linkedin.com>wrote:
> Hey Steve,
>
> I think Jakob might already have a patch for this. Jakob, didn't we have a
> patch for this prior to 0.7.0 that got lost when we open sourced?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On 2/23/14 6:34 PM, "syates@stevendyates.com" <sy...@stevendyates.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Dear Dev's, does anyone have a problem if I take a stab at SAMZA-50
> >titled "Log both RMI and JMX ports in internal JMX server" .
> >
> >Let me know if anyone else would prefer to take this on otherwise I
> >will give it a shot over the next few nights.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Steven Yates
> >
>
>
Re: SAMZA-50 Attempt
Posted by Chris Riccomini <cr...@linkedin.com>.
Hey Steve,
I think Jakob might already have a patch for this. Jakob, didn't we have a
patch for this prior to 0.7.0 that got lost when we open sourced?
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/23/14 6:34 PM, "syates@stevendyates.com" <sy...@stevendyates.com>
wrote:
>Dear Dev's, does anyone have a problem if I take a stab at SAMZA-50
>titled "Log both RMI and JMX ports in internal JMX server" .
>
>Let me know if anyone else would prefer to take this on otherwise I
>will give it a shot over the next few nights.
>
>Cheers
>Steven Yates
>