You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@apache.org> on 2007/06/26 10:42:08 UTC
Re: svn commit: r550739 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
If the 2.2.3 jars work ok with the beta1 code and they're available in a
repo then could we just change the SCA and DAS pom's to exclude the
2.2.2jars and include the
2.2.3 ones?
...ant
On 6/26/07, kelvingoodson@apache.org <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Author: kelvingoodson
> Date: Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> New Revision: 550739
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550739
> Log:
> Updating the trunk to EMF 2.2.3 -- this doesn't fix the DAS release
> problem because they are based on the SDO beta1, and so still require EMF
> 2.2.2 to be published somewhere, but at last it stops the trunk from
> failing. This update solves part of the issue in TUSCANY-1369
>
> Modified:
> incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
>
> Modified: incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=550739&r1=550738&r2=550739
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml (original)
> +++ incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
>
> <properties>
> <specVersion>2.1</specVersion>
> - <emfVersion>2.2.2</emfVersion>
> + <emfVersion>2.2.3</emfVersion>
> <sdo.version>${version}</sdo.version>
> </properties>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-commits-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-commits-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: svn commit: r550739 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
The EMF 2.2.2 are back into maven repos, we should be ok for now.
On 6/26/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> You can stop them being picked up transitively with:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId>
> <artifactId>tuscany-sdo-impl</artifactId>
> <version>1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.eclipse.emf</groupId>
> <artifactId>common</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> ... and all the other emf dependencies ...
> </exclusions>
>
> Just tried this, unfortunately it doesn't seem like you can do that for
> maven plugins so as we're using the tuscany-sdo-plugin in both SCA and DAS
> that continues to want the 2.2.2 jars.
>
> So looks like the next DAS and SCA releases are blocked till either the
> 2.2.2 jars become available in some public repository or there's a new SDO
> release using the 2.2.3 ones.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 6/26/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If the levels of the EMF dependency are not defined transitively via the
> > SDO dependency then I guess that should be fine. I had imagined they would
> > have been picked up indirectly from the beta1 pom.
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin.
> >
> > On 26/06/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > If the 2.2.3 jars work ok with the beta1 code and they're available in a
> > > repo then could we just change the SCA and DAS pom's to exclude the
> > > 2.2.2jars and include the
> > > 2.2.3 ones?
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> > > On 6/26/07, kelvingoodson@apache.org < kelvingoodson@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Author: kelvingoodson
> > > > Date: Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> > > > New Revision: 550739
> > > >
> > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550739
> > > > Log:
> > > > Updating the trunk to EMF 2.2.3 -- this doesn't fix the DAS release
> > > > problem because they are based on the SDO beta1, and so still require
> > EMF
> > > > 2.2.2 to be published somewhere, but at last it stops the trunk from
> > > > failing. This update solves part of the issue in TUSCANY-1369
> > > >
> > > > Modified:
> > > > incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> > > >
> > > > Modified: incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> > > > URL:
> > > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=550739&r1=550738&r2=550739
> > > >
> > > >
> > ==============================================================================
> >
> > > > --- incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml (original)
> > > > +++ incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> > > > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
> > > >
> > > > <properties>
> > > > <specVersion>2.1</specVersion>
> > > > - <emfVersion>2.2.2</emfVersion>
> > > > + <emfVersion>2.2.3</emfVersion>
> > > > < sdo.version>${version}</sdo.version>
> > > > </properties>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-commits-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-commits-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r550739 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
You can stop them being picked up transitively with:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId>
<artifactId>tuscany-sdo-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.eclipse.emf</groupId>
<artifactId>common</artifactId>
</exclusion>
... and all the other emf dependencies ...
</exclusions>
Just tried this, unfortunately it doesn't seem like you can do that for
maven plugins so as we're using the tuscany-sdo-plugin in both SCA and DAS
that continues to want the 2.2.2 jars.
So looks like the next DAS and SCA releases are blocked till either the
2.2.2 jars become available in some public repository or there's a new SDO
release using the 2.2.3 ones.
...ant
On 6/26/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If the levels of the EMF dependency are not defined transitively via the
> SDO dependency then I guess that should be fine. I had imagined they would
> have been picked up indirectly from the beta1 pom.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
> On 26/06/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > If the 2.2.3 jars work ok with the beta1 code and they're available in a
> > repo then could we just change the SCA and DAS pom's to exclude the
> > 2.2.2jars and include the
> > 2.2.3 ones?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 6/26/07, kelvingoodson@apache.org < kelvingoodson@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Author: kelvingoodson
> > > Date: Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> > > New Revision: 550739
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550739
> > > Log:
> > > Updating the trunk to EMF 2.2.3 -- this doesn't fix the DAS release
> > > problem because they are based on the SDO beta1, and so still require
> EMF
> > > 2.2.2 to be published somewhere, but at last it stops the trunk from
> > > failing. This update solves part of the issue in TUSCANY-1369
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > > incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> > >
> > > Modified: incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> > > URL:
> > >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=550739&r1=550738&r2=550739
> > >
> > >
> ==============================================================================
>
> > > --- incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml (original)
> > > +++ incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> > > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
> > >
> > > <properties>
> > > <specVersion>2.1</specVersion>
> > > - <emfVersion>2.2.2</emfVersion>
> > > + <emfVersion>2.2.3</emfVersion>
> > > < sdo.version>${version}</sdo.version>
> > > </properties>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-commits-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-commits-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: svn commit: r550739 - /incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com>.
If the levels of the EMF dependency are not defined transitively via the SDO
dependency then I guess that should be fine. I had imagined they would have
been picked up indirectly from the beta1 pom.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 26/06/07, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> If the 2.2.3 jars work ok with the beta1 code and they're available in a
> repo then could we just change the SCA and DAS pom's to exclude the
> 2.2.2jars and include the
> 2.2.3 ones?
>
> ...ant
>
> On 6/26/07, kelvingoodson@apache.org <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: kelvingoodson
> > Date: Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> > New Revision: 550739
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550739
> > Log:
> > Updating the trunk to EMF 2.2.3 -- this doesn't fix the DAS release
> > problem because they are based on the SDO beta1, and so still require
EMF
> > 2.2.2 to be published somewhere, but at last it stops the trunk from
> > failing. This update solves part of the issue in TUSCANY-1369
> >
> > Modified:
> > incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> >
> > Modified: incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml
> > URL:
> >
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=550739&r1=550738&r2=550739
> >
> >
==============================================================================
> > --- incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml (original)
> > +++ incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml Tue Jun 26 01:38:08 2007
> > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
> >
> > <properties>
> > <specVersion>2.1</specVersion>
> > - <emfVersion>2.2.2</emfVersion>
> > + <emfVersion>2.2.3</emfVersion>
> > <sdo.version>${version}</sdo.version>
> > </properties>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-commits-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-commits-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>