You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> on 2008/08/11 20:26:46 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Hi Everyone,
Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig 0.1.0-incubating. We had 4
+1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes. (Message-ID:
<23...@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com>)
.
The artifacts are available at
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
The attached NOTICE file looks ok to me, it should also have the following
two lines at the top:
Apache Pig
Copyright 2008 The Apache Software Foundation
See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice.
I think you will need to restart as to fix the NOTICE file you'll need to
build a new distribution. It has been done in the past that the dev list and
general@ votes on the respin are done in parallel though.
...ant
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote:
> Does the attached notice file look correct?
>
> Also, does this mean we need to restart the entire process?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olga
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* ant.elder@gmail.com [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *ant
> elder
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:32 PM
> *To:* Olga Natkovich
> *Cc:* general@incubator.apache.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
>
> Replies inline.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: ant elder [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
>> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich
>> > <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Everyone,
>> > >
>> > > Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig
>> > 0.1.0-incubating. We had
>> > > 4
>> > > +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes.
>> > (Message-ID:
>> > >
>> > <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1020F594E@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com
>> > > >)
>> > > .
>> > >
>> > > The artifacts are available at
>> > >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
>> <http://people.ap
>> > > ache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
>> > >
>> > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
>> <http://people.a
>> > > pache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
>> > >
>> > > Olga
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > The main issue is the NOTICE file is missing some copyrights
>> > for the 3rd party products that are included such as javacc,
>> > jsch, and jetty (jetty is embedded within the
>> > pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar). I think this should be fixed
>> > for this release.
>>
>> I put the licenses in separate files in the lib directory where all the
>> 3rd party libraries are following Hadoop model. I did not realize that
>> they had to go to the notice file. I can move them if needed. Also jetty
>> is part of Hadoop distribution; is it sufficient just to have Hadoop
>> license present?
>>
>
> Having the licenses in the separate lib directory is fine but the top
> NOTICE file still needs to include any attributions. For example, pig
> includes javacc and the javacc license says "Copyright (c) 2003 Sun
> Microsystems, Inc." and the JavaCC license says "Redistribution in binary
> form must reproduce the above copyright notice", so add the pig NOTICE file
> something like:
>
> This product includes/uses the JavaCC (https://javacc.dev.java.net/),
> Copyright (c) 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
> You need that for javacc, jsch, and jetty.
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > Some other comments:
>> >
>> > If the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is to be distributed
>> > separately (eg maven repo) then it needs to include
>> > LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files.
>>
>> What is the DISCLAIMER file?
>>
>
> Its the text at the bottom of the pig README, or that text can be in a file
> on its own. The pig distro is fine as-is, i was just pointing out that _if_
> the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is going to be distributed seperately then
> it would also need to include its own legal files.
>
>
>>
>> > The signature used to sign the distribution isn't available
>> > online from a public key server, eg pgp.surfnet.nl
>>
>> Keys are at /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig on people.apache.org.
>> Is this not the right location?
>>
>
> Yes thats the right place, but you can also publish them to a public key
> server and then if peoples clients are configured correctly the keys will be
> downloaded automatically. See
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver
>
>
>>
>> > The release should be built from an svn tag but there doesn't
>> > seem to be one.
>>
>> I created a branch for it. Will add a tag as well.
>>
>> > Would be helpful to include a RAT report in the VOTE email
>>
>> Attached now
>>
>> >
>> > Other than that it looks good, if the NOTICE file is updated
>> > it would get my
>> > +1.
>> >
>> > ...ant
>> >
>>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Does the attached notice file look correct?
Also, does this mean we need to restart the entire process?
Thanks,
Olga
________________________________
From: ant.elder@gmail.com [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of ant elder
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:32 PM
To: Olga Natkovich
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Replies inline.
...ant
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <
olgan@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up
questions inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ant elder [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig
0.1.0-incubating
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich
> <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig
> 0.1.0-incubating. We had
> > 4
> > +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1
votes.
> (Message-ID:
> >
> <
236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1020F594E@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com
> > >)
> > .
> >
> > The artifacts are available at
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/> <
http://people.ap
> > ache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> >
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/> <
http://people.a
> > pache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> > >
> >
> > Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >
>
> The main issue is the NOTICE file is missing some
copyrights
> for the 3rd party products that are included such as
javacc,
> jsch, and jetty (jetty is embedded within the
> pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar). I think this should be
fixed
> for this release.
I put the licenses in separate files in the lib
directory where all the
3rd party libraries are following Hadoop model. I did
not realize that
they had to go to the notice file. I can move them if
needed. Also jetty
is part of Hadoop distribution; is it sufficient just to
have Hadoop
license present?
Having the licenses in the separate lib directory is fine but
the top NOTICE file still needs to include any attributions. For
example, pig includes javacc and the javacc license says "Copyright (c)
2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc." and the JavaCC license says "Redistribution
in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice", so add the
pig NOTICE file something like:
This product includes/uses the JavaCC (
https://javacc.dev.java.net/),
Copyright (c) 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
You need that for javacc, jsch, and jetty.
>
> Some other comments:
>
> If the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is to be
distributed
> separately (eg maven repo) then it needs to include
> LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files.
What is the DISCLAIMER file?
Its the text at the bottom of the pig README, or that text can
be in a file on its own. The pig distro is fine as-is, i was just
pointing out that _if_ the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is going to be
distributed seperately then it would also need to include its own legal
files.
> The signature used to sign the distribution isn't
available
> online from a public key server, eg pgp.surfnet.nl
Keys are at /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig on
people.apache.org.
Is this not the right location?
Yes thats the right place, but you can also publish them to a
public key server and then if peoples clients are configured correctly
the keys will be downloaded automatically. See
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver
> The release should be built from an svn tag but there
doesn't
> seem to be one.
I created a branch for it. Will add a tag as well.
> Would be helpful to include a RAT report in the VOTE
email
Attached now
>
> Other than that it looks good, if the NOTICE file is
updated
> it would get my
> +1.
>
> ...ant
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
Replies inline.
...ant
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ant elder [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich
> > <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig
> > 0.1.0-incubating. We had
> > > 4
> > > +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes.
> > (Message-ID:
> > >
> > <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1020F594E@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com
> > > >)
> > > .
> > >
> > > The artifacts are available at
> > >
> > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> <http://people.ap
> > > ache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> > >
> > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> <http://people.a
> > > pache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> > > >
> > >
> > > Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
> > >
> > > Olga
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The main issue is the NOTICE file is missing some copyrights
> > for the 3rd party products that are included such as javacc,
> > jsch, and jetty (jetty is embedded within the
> > pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar). I think this should be fixed
> > for this release.
>
> I put the licenses in separate files in the lib directory where all the
> 3rd party libraries are following Hadoop model. I did not realize that
> they had to go to the notice file. I can move them if needed. Also jetty
> is part of Hadoop distribution; is it sufficient just to have Hadoop
> license present?
>
Having the licenses in the separate lib directory is fine but the top NOTICE
file still needs to include any attributions. For example, pig includes
javacc and the javacc license says "Copyright (c) 2003 Sun Microsystems,
Inc." and the JavaCC license says "Redistribution in binary form must
reproduce the above copyright notice", so add the pig NOTICE file something
like:
This product includes/uses the JavaCC (https://javacc.dev.java.net/),
Copyright (c) 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
You need that for javacc, jsch, and jetty.
>
> >
> > Some other comments:
> >
> > If the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is to be distributed
> > separately (eg maven repo) then it needs to include
> > LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files.
>
> What is the DISCLAIMER file?
>
Its the text at the bottom of the pig README, or that text can be in a file
on its own. The pig distro is fine as-is, i was just pointing out that _if_
the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is going to be distributed seperately then
it would also need to include its own legal files.
>
> > The signature used to sign the distribution isn't available
> > online from a public key server, eg pgp.surfnet.nl
>
> Keys are at /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig on people.apache.org.
> Is this not the right location?
>
Yes thats the right place, but you can also publish them to a public key
server and then if peoples clients are configured correctly the keys will be
downloaded automatically. See
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keyserver
>
> > The release should be built from an svn tag but there doesn't
> > seem to be one.
>
> I created a branch for it. Will add a tag as well.
>
> > Would be helpful to include a RAT report in the VOTE email
>
> Attached now
>
> >
> > Other than that it looks good, if the NOTICE file is updated
> > it would get my
> > +1.
> >
> > ...ant
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ant elder [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich
>> <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >
>> > Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig
>> 0.1.0-incubating. We had
>> > 4
>> > +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes.
>> (Message-ID:
>> >
>> <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1020F594E@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com
>> > >)
>> > .
>> >
>> > The artifacts are available at
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.ap
>> > ache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
>> >
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.a
>> > pache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
>> > >
>> >
>> > Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
>> >
>> > Olga
>> >
>> >
>>
>> The main issue is the NOTICE file is missing some copyrights
>> for the 3rd party products that are included such as javacc,
>> jsch, and jetty (jetty is embedded within the
>> pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar). I think this should be fixed
>> for this release.
>
> I put the licenses in separate files in the lib directory where all the
> 3rd party libraries are following Hadoop model. I did not realize that
> they had to go to the notice file. I can move them if needed. Also jetty
> is part of Hadoop distribution; is it sufficient just to have Hadoop
> license present?
>
>>
>> Some other comments:
>>
>> If the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is to be distributed
>> separately (eg maven repo) then it needs to include
>> LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files.
>
> What is the DISCLAIMER file?
The disclaimer is what you have at the bottom of your README.txt:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/branches/branch-0.1/README.txt
Other podlings put that in a file called "DISCLAIMER" - for example:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/tags/M2.1/RC6/DISCLAIMER
I looked to see if there was any docs on this - they look like a work
in progress but - according to those it looks like what you have is
OK:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
Niall
>> The signature used to sign the distribution isn't available
>> online from a public key server, eg pgp.surfnet.nl
>
> Keys are at /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig on people.apache.org.
> Is this not the right location?
>
>> The release should be built from an svn tag but there doesn't
>> seem to be one.
>
> I created a branch for it. Will add a tag as well.
>
>> Would be helpful to include a RAT report in the VOTE email
>
> Attached now
>
>>
>> Other than that it looks good, if the NOTICE file is updated
>> it would get my
>> +1.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi,
Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ant elder [mailto:ant.elder@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich
> <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig
> 0.1.0-incubating. We had
> > 4
> > +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes.
> (Message-ID:
> >
> <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1020F594E@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com
> > >)
> > .
> >
> > The artifacts are available at
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.ap
> > ache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> >
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.a
> > pache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> > >
> >
> > Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >
>
> The main issue is the NOTICE file is missing some copyrights
> for the 3rd party products that are included such as javacc,
> jsch, and jetty (jetty is embedded within the
> pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar). I think this should be fixed
> for this release.
I put the licenses in separate files in the lib directory where all the
3rd party libraries are following Hadoop model. I did not realize that
they had to go to the notice file. I can move them if needed. Also jetty
is part of Hadoop distribution; is it sufficient just to have Hadoop
license present?
>
> Some other comments:
>
> If the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is to be distributed
> separately (eg maven repo) then it needs to include
> LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files.
What is the DISCLAIMER file?
> The signature used to sign the distribution isn't available
> online from a public key server, eg pgp.surfnet.nl
Keys are at /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig on people.apache.org.
Is this not the right location?
> The release should be built from an svn tag but there doesn't
> seem to be one.
I created a branch for it. Will add a tag as well.
> Would be helpful to include a RAT report in the VOTE email
Attached now
>
> Other than that it looks good, if the NOTICE file is updated
> it would get my
> +1.
>
> ...ant
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig 0.1.0-incubating. We had 4
> +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes. (Message-ID:
> <23...@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com>)
> .
>
> The artifacts are available at
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eolga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/>
> >
>
> Please vote by 6 pm on Thursday, 8/14.
>
> Olga
>
>
The main issue is the NOTICE file is missing some copyrights for the 3rd
party products that are included such as javacc, jsch, and jetty (jetty is
embedded within the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar). I think this should be
fixed for this release.
Some other comments:
If the pig-0.1.0-incubating-core.jar is to be distributed separately (eg
maven repo) then it needs to include LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files.
The signature used to sign the distribution isn't available online from a
public key server, eg pgp.surfnet.nl
The release should be built from an svn tag but there doesn't seem to be
one.
Would be helpful to include a RAT report in the VOTE email
Other than that it looks good, if the NOTICE file is updated it would get my
+1.
...ant