You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Karl Fogel <kf...@newton.ch.collab.net> on 2002/07/29 16:14:41 UTC

Re: Beta timeframe

Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org> writes:
> What I meant is that you guys have a time frame for releasing beta.
> My schedule may or may not coincide with that.  If I can have it in
> by the time you guys want a beta, cool.  If not, oh well.
> 
> As we've mentioned before, I know what needs to happen, but this
> change is massive.  I've tried several times to sit down and take
> a stab at it and just converting one function to use the baton is
> really painful.  -- justin

Yeah, I know what you mean.  Even the smallest change cascades through
so many layers...

Well, if you can give us an idea of your schedule, we'll be better
able to plan.  We *would* like to get it in 1.0, though exactly how
much coding time we can shift to it is still an open question.

Thanks,
-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Beta timeframe

Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:14:41AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Yeah, I know what you mean.  Even the smallest change cascades through
> so many layers...
> 
> Well, if you can give us an idea of your schedule, we'll be better
> able to plan.  We *would* like to get it in 1.0, though exactly how
> much coding time we can shift to it is still an open question.

Since I can't reproduce the Darwin SVN hang anymore (I think due to
the inclusion of -O2 in my current builds), I'm now trying to work on
my libtool replacement so that I can get builds of SVN to take
something less than a hour on Darwin.  Once I can get the builds to
become faster, then I'll play with svn-config trying to get the right
logic in-place to handle in-tree dependencies.  Then, I'll start
working on the libsvn_wc changes.

I'm slowly making progress on my libtool clone, so I'm hoping by the
end of this week, I'm starting to tackle the libsvn_wc problem.  I'd
hazard a guess that it would take about another week to get the
libsvn_wc changes into the branch.  Then, it needs to be merged back
into the trunk and vetted.

All of this presupposes that I don't get nailed by something over
in httpd-land.  Hopefully, that gives a better picture of my todo
list...  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org