You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Michael Bouschen <mi...@akquinet.de> on 2017/07/05 19:02:42 UTC
JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday July 6, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time
(PDT)
Hi,
We will have our regular meeting Thursday, July 6 at 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) to discuss JDO TCK issues and status.
We use the new dial-in for audio and video. You need a Skype account to join.
https://join.skype.com/euV54RJwJBcf
Agenda:
1. JDO-764 "Allow JDO annotations to be used in meta-annotations" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764
2. JDO-761 "Add TCK test running sample queries from the spec" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-761
3. JDO-760 "Spec update regarding whether Query.execute() returns List or Collection" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-760
4. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749
5. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-745 "Support bitwise operations in JDOQL" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-745
6. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log
7. Other issues
Action Items from weeks past:
[May 30 2017] AI Craig: Close the JIRA JDO-762
[Apr 12 2017] AI Craig: write a test case to see how the RI behaves JDO-762.
[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods JDO-749?
[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods? Any additional spec updates JDO-745?
[Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP
[Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625
[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process.
--
Michael Bouschen
akquinet tech@spree GmbH
Bülowstraße 66 • D-10783 Berlin
Tel: +49 30 235520-33
Fax: +49 30 217520-12
E-Mail: michael.bouschen@akquinet.de <ma...@akquinet.de>
Web: www.akquinet.de <http://www.akquinet.de/>
Geschäftsführung: Martin Weber, Dr. Torsten Fink
Amtsgericht Berlin HRB 86780 • USt.-Id. Nr.: DE 225 964 680
[Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/akquinet> [XING]
<https://www.xing.com/companies/akquinetag> [G+]
<https://plus.google.com/b/111054946250796705170/+akquinet/posts>
[LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/akquinet-ag> [Twitter]
<https://twitter.com/akquinet>
Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday July 6, 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)
Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell
Next meeting: July 11 9:00 AM PDT
Agenda:
1. JDO-764 "Allow JDO annotations to be used in meta-annotations" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-764
Patch uploaded for review. Specification questions:
When there are multiple instances of the same annotation how are duplicate annotation parameters handled? For example, if table=foo is specified in one PersistenceCapable annotation and table=bar is specified in another, which one is used? Is this an error? Last one wins? Does Java present annotations in source file order?
Do we want these annotations to be REPEATABLE? There does not seem to be a use case.
Bug in the patch: remove embeddedOnly=true from the annotation DatastoreIdDiscriminatorClassNameInheritanceNew
2. JDO-761 "Add TCK test running sample queries from the spec" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-761
There is another patch including single string queries with FROM clause.
3. JDO-760 "Spec update regarding whether Query.execute() returns List or Collection" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-760
4. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749
5. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-745 "Support bitwise operations in JDOQL" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-745
6. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log
7. Other issues
Action Items from weeks past:
[May 30 2017] AI Craig: Close the JIRA JDO-762
[Apr 12 2017] AI Craig: write a test case to see how the RI behaves JDO-762.
[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods JDO-749?
[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods? Any additional spec updates JDO-745?
[Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP
[Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625
[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process.
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org