You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/06/01 12:47:04 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-5360) Down-converted uncompressed batches
should respect fetch offset
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16032922#comment-16032922 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-5360:
---------------------------------------
GitHub user ijuma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3191
KAFKA-5360: Down-converted uncompressed batches should respect fetch offset
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ijuma/kafka kafka-5360-down-converted-uncompressed-respect-offset
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3191.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #3191
----
commit d4bba5f53f0ba4a95a4d152087deba9239d81434
Author: Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
Date: 2017-06-01T12:46:20Z
KAFKA-5360: Down-converted uncompressed batches should respect fetch offset
----
> Down-converted uncompressed batches should respect fetch offset
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-5360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5360
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ismael Juma
> Assignee: Ismael Juma
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.11.0.0
>
>
> More specifically, V2 messages are always batched (whether compressed or not) while V0/V1 are only batched if they are compressed.
> Clients like librdkafka expect to receive messages from the requested offset when dealing with uncompressed V0/V1 messages. When converting from V2 to V0/1, we seem to be returning all the messages in the V2 batch instead of messages from the requested offset.
> Thanks to [~edenhill] for investigating this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)