You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> on 2007/03/16 22:05:36 UTC
Fwd: svn commit: r519138
> From: lresende@apache.org
> Date: March 16, 2007 1:45:22 PM PDT
> To: tuscany-commits@ws.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r519138 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/
> kernel/contribution: ./ src/ src/main/ src/main/java/ src/main/java/
> org/ src/main/java/org/apache/ src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/
> src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/spi/ src/main/java/org/apache/tus...
> Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Author: lresende
> Date: Fri Mar 16 13:45:21 2007
> New Revision: 519138
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=519138
> Log:
> Placeholder to make contribution a separate kernel module
Where/when was this discussed? Also, what would be in it?
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r519138
Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:58 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> After thinking about it, I'm starting to think that a better
>>> place for it is
>>> under /java/sca/services.Thoughts ?
>>
>> That was exactly why I asked :-) I think it should be under
>> services and modularizing kernel is a different topic.
>
> sca/runtime/services is probably better as this is likely to be
> primordial.
Ah yes, I didn't look closely at which /services directory - sca/
runtime/services is better.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r519138
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> After thinking about it, I'm starting to think that a better place
>> for it is
>> under /java/sca/services.Thoughts ?
>
> That was exactly why I asked :-) I think it should be under
> services and modularizing kernel is a different topic.
sca/runtime/services is probably better as this is likely to be
primordial.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r519138
Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> I think there has been various threads talking about the contribution
> services on the dev mailing list. Jeremy suggested having a
> contribution
> tool (command line and plugin) [1] and there was some other
> discussions
> around integrating WSDL2Java with the contribution service [2]
> and I think it does not make sense to have direct dependency on the
> whole
> kernel core for these tools.
>
> There was also couple discussions around modularization as well,
> where I
> mentioned I'd start having contribution services moved to a
> separate module
> [3]. And the idea is to have the contribution implementation on
> this new
> module.
>
> After thinking about it, I'm starting to think that a better place
> for it is
> under /java/sca/services.Thoughts ?
That was exactly why I asked :-) I think it should be under services
and modularizing kernel is a different topic.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r519138
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
I think there has been various threads talking about the contribution
services on the dev mailing list. Jeremy suggested having a contribution
tool (command line and plugin) [1] and there was some other discussions
around integrating WSDL2Java with the contribution service [2]
and I think it does not make sense to have direct dependency on the whole
kernel core for these tools.
There was also couple discussions around modularization as well, where I
mentioned I'd start having contribution services moved to a separate module
[3]. And the idea is to have the contribution implementation on this new
module.
After thinking about it, I'm starting to think that a better place for it is
under /java/sca/services.Thoughts ?
[1] - http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg15557.html
[2] - http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg15179.html
[3] - http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg15359.html
On 3/16/07, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
>
>
> > From: lresende@apache.org
> > Date: March 16, 2007 1:45:22 PM PDT
> > To: tuscany-commits@ws.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r519138 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/
> > kernel/contribution: ./ src/ src/main/ src/main/java/ src/main/java/
> > org/ src/main/java/org/apache/ src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/
> > src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/spi/ src/main/java/org/apache/tus...
> > Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> >
> > Author: lresende
> > Date: Fri Mar 16 13:45:21 2007
> > New Revision: 519138
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=519138
> > Log:
> > Placeholder to make contribution a separate kernel module
>
> Where/when was this discussed? Also, what would be in it?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende