You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to community@apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2002/10/28 20:42:32 UTC
RE: ASF Membership Nomination
> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:aaron@clove.org]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 20:15
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:28AM -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > I hereby nominate Ted Husted.
>
> The problem with nominations in a forum that does not perfectly match
> the voting body is that it makes it difficult to hold discussions
> about the nominee in a fair way. Nominations, IMNSHO, belong on the
> members@apache.org.
I totally agree. There should be two parties informed: the nominee
and the members. No more, no less.
Sander
Re: ASF Membership Nomination
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> When successfully nominated, I think the 'promotion' of the
> committer to a member should be trumpeted on community. There's
> no need to know about the voting, and whether someone doesn't get
> in, but there is a need to know when someone gets in to help build
> community.
absolutely +1.
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
RE: ASF Membership Nomination
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:aaron@clove.org]
> > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:15
>
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:28AM -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > > I hereby nominate Ted Husted.
> >
> > The problem with nominations in a forum that does not perfectly match
> > the voting body is that it makes it difficult to hold discussions
> > about the nominee in a fair way. Nominations, IMNSHO, belong on the
> > members@apache.org.
>
> I totally agree. There should be two parties informed: the nominee
> and the members. No more, no less.
Disagree and agree. I think your and Aaron's points are good, and that
your line above is nearly good.
When successfully nominated, I think the 'promotion' of the committer to a
member should be trumpeted on community. There's no need to know about the
voting, and whether someone doesn't get in, but there is a need to know
when someone gets in to help build community.
Hen