You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> on 2015/12/01 11:54:14 UTC
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
hi Upayavira,
sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355
I'm fixing that
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
LONDON) <cp...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await
> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch
> (and trunk and branch_5x).
>
> Christine
>
> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
> release?)
>
> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear
> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on getting the
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not?
> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op.
>
> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
> release?)
>
> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this
> branch.
>
> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will
> delay a release candidate build.
>
> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets
> asap.
>
> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> "Add tests for bin/post"
>
> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
> - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira
>
>
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Posted by "david.w.smiley@gmail.com" <da...@gmail.com>.
SOLR-8180 (jcl-over-slf4j) is there too now, some 30min ago.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:27 PM Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Thx, I hope to create the first RC tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 06:36 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > I'm done with SOLR-8355
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > hi Upayavira,
> > > sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355
> > > I'm fixing that
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > LONDON) <cp...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await
> > >> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4
> branch
> > >> (and trunk and branch_5x).
> > >>
> > >> Christine
> > >>
> > >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58
> > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A
> 5.4
> > >> release?)
> > >>
> > >> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so
> clear
> > >> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others.
> > >>
> > >> Upayavira
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> LONDON)
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts on getting the
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr
> or not?
> > >> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a
> no-op.
> > >>
> > >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46
> > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
> > >> release?)
> > >>
> > >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in
> this
> > >> branch.
> > >>
> > >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
> > >> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version
> 5.4 will
> > >> delay a release candidate build.
> > >>
> > >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these
> tickets
> > >> asap.
> > >>
> > >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> Upayavira
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature
> > >> freeze starts.
> > >>
> > >> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version
> 5.4. I
> > >> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that
> the
> > >> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>
> > >> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble)
> blocker
> > >> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization
> causes
> > >> issue with replication"
> > >>
> > >> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the
> release?
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> > >> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>
> > >> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> > >> "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>
> > >> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding
> back a
> > >> release
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> > >> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9
> (b71)"
> > >>
> > >> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker
> > >> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > >>
> > >> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will
> not
> > >> consider this a blocker either.
> > >>
> > >> - o -
> > >>
> > >> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone
> > >> have comments/observations here?
> > >>
> > >> I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>
> > >> Upayavira
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
Thx, I hope to create the first RC tomorrow.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 06:36 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> I'm done with SOLR-8355
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hi Upayavira,
> > sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355
> > I'm fixing that
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > LONDON) <cp...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await
> >> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch
> >> (and trunk and branch_5x).
> >>
> >> Christine
> >>
> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58
> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
> >> release?)
> >>
> >> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear
> >> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others.
> >>
> >> Upayavira
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on getting the
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not?
> >> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op.
> >>
> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46
> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
> >> release?)
> >>
> >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this
> >> branch.
> >>
> >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
> >> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will
> >> delay a release candidate build.
> >>
> >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets
> >> asap.
> >>
> >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Upayavira
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> >>
> >> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
> >> freeze starts.
> >>
> >> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> >> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> >> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> >>
> >> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> >> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> >> issue with replication"
> >>
> >> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> >> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> >>
> >> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> >> "Add tests for bin/post"
> >>
> >> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> >> release
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> >> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
> >>
> >> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
> >> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> >>
> >> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> >> consider this a blocker either.
> >>
> >> - o -
> >>
> >> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
> >> have comments/observations here?
> >>
> >> I will create the branch shortly.
> >>
> >> Upayavira
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.
I'm done with SOLR-8355
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi Upayavira,
> sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355
> I'm fixing that
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> LONDON) <cp...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await
>> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch
>> (and trunk and branch_5x).
>>
>> Christine
>>
>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
>> release?)
>>
>> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear
>> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts on getting the
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not?
>> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op.
>>
>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
>> release?)
>>
>> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this
>> branch.
>>
>> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
>> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will
>> delay a release candidate build.
>>
>> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets
>> asap.
>>
>> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
>> freeze starts.
>>
>> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
>> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>
>> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>> issue with replication"
>>
>> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>
>> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>> "Add tests for bin/post"
>>
>> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>> release
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>>
>> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>
>> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>> consider this a blocker either.
>>
>> - o -
>>
>> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
>> have comments/observations here?
>>
>> I will create the branch shortly.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org