You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Chia-liang Kao <cl...@clkao.org> on 2006/10/31 04:00:08 UTC
r20666 for 1.4.1 (svn_ra_replay for Perl Bindings)
Hi,
I just discovered today that svn_ra_replay in Perl doesn't work on the 1.4.x
branch. I made a branch for merge and proposed in STATUS. I know this is
rather bad timing, as a few people have already sigined the release tarball.
I've just finished the ra_replay support in svk, and this fix will let me get
svk users start to upgrde to 1.4. Please vote and I'm sorry for the potential
release delay this last-minute finding might cause.
Cheers,
CLK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: r20666 for 1.4.1 (svn_ra_replay for Perl Bindings)
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@collab.net>.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Blair Zajac wrote:
> David Anderson wrote:
> >fwiw, I'm happy to hold 1.4.1 to fix this issue in the perl bindings.
> >Svk is an important consumer of our APIs, and as such it should be
> >able to use the new facilities we provide them now, rather than in a
> >month or two when we feel like releasing 1.4.2.
>
> Why don't we also get r22140 into the next release? It would only
> need one other +1 on it.
Yeah, that would be a good bug fix to have. I just reviewed the
change and +1'd it, but it needs one more +1 to make it in.
Re: r20666 for 1.4.1 (svn_ra_replay for Perl Bindings)
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
David Anderson wrote:
> fwiw, I'm happy to hold 1.4.1 to fix this issue in the perl bindings.
> Svk is an important consumer of our APIs, and as such it should be
> able to use the new facilities we provide them now, rather than in a
> month or two when we feel like releasing 1.4.2.
Why don't we also get r22140 into the next release? It would only need one
other +1 on it.
Regards,
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: r20666 for 1.4.1 (svn_ra_replay for Perl Bindings)
Posted by David Anderson <da...@natulte.net>.
fwiw, I'm happy to hold 1.4.1 to fix this issue in the perl bindings.
Svk is an important consumer of our APIs, and as such it should be
able to use the new facilities we provide them now, rather than in a
month or two when we feel like releasing 1.4.2.
- Dave
On 10/30/06, David Glasser <gl...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Chia-liang Kao <cl...@clkao.org> wrote:
> > I just discovered today that svn_ra_replay in Perl doesn't work on the 1.4.x
> > branch. I made a branch for merge and proposed in STATUS. I know this is
> > rather bad timing, as a few people have already sigined the release tarball.
> > I've just finished the ra_replay support in svk, and this fix will let me get
> > svk users start to upgrde to 1.4. Please vote and I'm sorry for the potential
> > release delay this last-minute finding might cause.
>
> I've:
>
> * Added a test for $ra->replay with Perl-implemented editors to
> subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/t/6ra.t on trunk
>
> * Quasi-backported that test to CL's 1.4.x-r20666 branch
>
> * Voted for the branch
>
> CL and his laptop have both crashed for the night, but if anyone else
> wants to check these out and vote for them that would be great. (We
> just need a +0 or +1 (concept) to backport it.)
>
> (As far as I know, SVK would be the second program (after svnsync) to
> take advantage of ra_replay; we're almost ready to release a version
> supporting it, but it won't work with the 1.4.x branch right now,
> which sucks. I'm sorry to hold up the release, but this is an
> important bugfix for SVK, and I suppose I'm biased. I'll be sure to
> retest and get new sigs in ASAP tomorrow.)
>
> --dave
>
> --
> David Glasser | glasser@mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: r20666 for 1.4.1 (svn_ra_replay for Perl Bindings)
Posted by David Glasser <gl...@mit.edu>.
On 10/30/06, Chia-liang Kao <cl...@clkao.org> wrote:
> I just discovered today that svn_ra_replay in Perl doesn't work on the 1.4.x
> branch. I made a branch for merge and proposed in STATUS. I know this is
> rather bad timing, as a few people have already sigined the release tarball.
> I've just finished the ra_replay support in svk, and this fix will let me get
> svk users start to upgrde to 1.4. Please vote and I'm sorry for the potential
> release delay this last-minute finding might cause.
I've:
* Added a test for $ra->replay with Perl-implemented editors to
subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/t/6ra.t on trunk
* Quasi-backported that test to CL's 1.4.x-r20666 branch
* Voted for the branch
CL and his laptop have both crashed for the night, but if anyone else
wants to check these out and vote for them that would be great. (We
just need a +0 or +1 (concept) to backport it.)
(As far as I know, SVK would be the second program (after svnsync) to
take advantage of ra_replay; we're almost ready to release a version
supporting it, but it won't work with the 1.4.x branch right now,
which sucks. I'm sorry to hold up the release, but this is an
important bugfix for SVK, and I suppose I'm biased. I'll be sure to
retest and get new sigs in ASAP tomorrow.)
--dave
--
David Glasser | glasser@mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org