We need more code like this! :-)

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

Now *this* code performs well!  We need a lot more code performing like this
in JAMES:

    [junit] Running org.apache.james.domain.XMLDomainListTest
    [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: -0.021 sec

With enough code performing like that, JAMES could deliver mail in even less
than no time at all.

	--- Noel



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: We need more code like this! :-)

[Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>]

Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
> Now *this* code performs well!  We need a lot more code performing like this
> in JAMES:
> 
>     [junit] Running org.apache.james.domain.XMLDomainListTest
>     [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: -0.021 sec
> 
> With enough code performing like that, JAMES could deliver mail in even less
> than no time at all.
> 
> 	--- Noel

Please don't publicize this too much: Norman and I were experimenting 
time travel to past, and we did some commit in james codebase. I 
guess/hope this does not infringe any existing patent.

You want to travel to 1879 ? Just do this:
----
for (long i = 0; i < 192219428572; i++) {
	xMLDomainListTest.runBare();
}
----

Stefano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org