You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Devin Han <de...@apache.org> on 2011/12/16 09:47:44 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
(1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
(2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
pom.xml.
(3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
(4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
Keys:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
--
-Devin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by Devin Han <de...@apache.org>.
Thank you for the explanation. OK I will remove JUnit info from L&N.
2011/12/20 Nick Burch <ni...@alfresco.com>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
>
>> I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE>
>>
>
> We do ship the junit jar in some of our release artifacts though, which is
> why it's there
>
> (It's also worth pointing out that long standing projects may not always
> be following the latest best practice on notice files, so they're not
> always the best models to follow)
>
> Nick
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org<ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org<ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
--
-Devin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by Nick Burch <ni...@alfresco.com>.
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
> I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
We do ship the junit jar in some of our release artifacts though, which is
why it's there
(It's also worth pointing out that long standing projects may not always
be following the latest best practice on notice files, so they're not
always the best models to follow)
Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by Devin Han <de...@apache.org>.
BTW: Oracle Multi-Schema XML Validator (MSV) and ISO RELAX JARV API to JAXP
1.3 validation API bridge also not included in the release jar, shall we
remove them?
2011/12/20 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> On 20 December 2011 02:30, Devin Han <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Thank you for point it out.
> > Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
> >
> > But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit
> dependence
> > in LICENSE files.
>
> No, not if it is not included in the release artifacts.
>
> > As our test code locate in the Apache SVN, it should also be a part of
> our
> > artifacts.
>
> Generally developers are expected to already have a copy of JUnit for
> testing purposes.
> For Maven projects it is downloaded automatically if necessary, and
> Ant projects can do the same, e.g. Tomcat uses JUnit but does not
> bundle it.
>
> If JUnit is not included in the release artifacts it must not be
> mentioned in the N&L files.
>
> > I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
>
> I've not looked at what POI bundles; there are a lot of incorrect N&L
> files around and it may be one of them.
>
> > 2011/12/16 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
> >> > (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release
> for
> >> > ODF Toolkit in Apache.
> >> >
> >> > This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
> >> > (1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
> >> > (2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
> >> > pom.xml.
> >> > (3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
> >> > (4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
> >> >
> >> > The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available
> at:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
> >> >
> >> > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
> >>
> >> The NOTICE & LICENSE files say that the product includes JUnit - but I
> >> could not find that on a brief check of the artifacts, and it's
> >> unusual to include test-only dependencies.
> >>
> >> If it's not included, it must not be mentioned in N&L.
> >>
> >> > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> >> > cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
> >> >
> >> > Keys:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit
> >> 0.5-incubating.
> >> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> >> > least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -Devin
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Devin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
-Devin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 20 December 2011 02:30, Devin Han <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thank you for point it out.
> Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
>
> But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence
> in LICENSE files.
No, not if it is not included in the release artifacts.
> As our test code locate in the Apache SVN, it should also be a part of our
> artifacts.
Generally developers are expected to already have a copy of JUnit for
testing purposes.
For Maven projects it is downloaded automatically if necessary, and
Ant projects can do the same, e.g. Tomcat uses JUnit but does not
bundle it.
If JUnit is not included in the release artifacts it must not be
mentioned in the N&L files.
> I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
I've not looked at what POI bundles; there are a lot of incorrect N&L
files around and it may be one of them.
> 2011/12/16 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>
>> On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han <de...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
>> > (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
>> > ODF Toolkit in Apache.
>> >
>> > This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
>> > (1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
>> > (2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
>> > pom.xml.
>> > (3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
>> > (4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
>> >
>> > The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available at:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
>> >
>> > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
>>
>> The NOTICE & LICENSE files say that the product includes JUnit - but I
>> could not find that on a brief check of the artifacts, and it's
>> unusual to include test-only dependencies.
>>
>> If it's not included, it must not be mentioned in N&L.
>>
>> > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>> > cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
>> >
>> > Keys:
>> >
>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit
>> 0.5-incubating.
>> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> > least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Devin
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Devin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by Devin Han <de...@apache.org>.
Thank you for point it out.
Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence
in LICENSE files.
As our test code locate in the Apache SVN, it should also be a part of our
artifacts.
I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
2011/12/16 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
> > (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
> > ODF Toolkit in Apache.
> >
> > This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
> > (1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
> > (2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
> > pom.xml.
> > (3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
> > (4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
> >
> > The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available at:
> >
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
> >
> > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> >
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
>
> The NOTICE & LICENSE files say that the product includes JUnit - but I
> could not find that on a brief check of the artifacts, and it's
> unusual to include test-only dependencies.
>
> If it's not included, it must not be mentioned in N&L.
>
> > The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> > cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
> >
> > Keys:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit
> 0.5-incubating.
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > --
> > -Devin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
-Devin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
> (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
> ODF Toolkit in Apache.
>
> This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
> (1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
> (2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
> pom.xml.
> (3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
> (4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
>
> The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available at:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
The NOTICE & LICENSE files say that the product includes JUnit - but I
could not find that on a brief check of the artifacts, and it's
unusual to include test-only dependencies.
If it's not included, it must not be mentioned in N&L.
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
>
> Keys:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> --
> -Devin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net>.
Hi Devin,
I know I haven't been completely engaged in ODF Toolkit (incubating) lately. I don't know if I have time to give this first release enough attention to vote before the deadline.
Please consider extending the 72 hours to a full week.
Best Regards,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Devin Han wrote:
> +1 ;)
>
> 2011/12/16 Devin Han <de...@apache.org>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
>> (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
>> ODF Toolkit in Apache.
>>
>> This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
>> (1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
>> (2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
>> pom.xml.
>> (3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
>> (4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
>>
>> The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available at:
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
>>
>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
>>
>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>> cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
>>
>> Keys:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating.
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> --
>> -Devin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Devin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating RC5
Posted by Devin Han <de...@apache.org>.
+1 ;)
2011/12/16 Devin Han <de...@apache.org>
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
> (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
> ODF Toolkit in Apache.
>
> This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
> (1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts;
> (2) Fix the broken line endings issue in LICENSE.txt, HEADER.txt, and
> pom.xml.
> (3) Remove "-rc3" from the name of artifacts.
> (4) Fix the Java 5 compatibility issue in XLST-Runner and Validator.
>
> The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating release is available at:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc5/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc5/
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> cbecd91eda074f9c291c00995cfc43dfc0a4a0e2.
>
> Keys:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 ODF Toolkit PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> --
> -Devin
>
--
-Devin