You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Scott Kurz (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2009/04/14 15:53:15 UTC
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2962) Throw an exception if multiple
same-name operations are detected by WSDL intf introspector
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12698777#action_12698777 ]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-2962:
-------------------------------------
If you run MyMain against the (bad) test.wsdl, you'll see the multiple WSDL4J Operations.
> Throw an exception if multiple same-name operations are detected by WSDL intf introspector
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2962
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2962
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> Reporter: Scott Kurz
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: MyMain.java, test.wsdl
>
>
> I noticed that a particular user error involving a badly-formed WSDL can be hard to debug.
> In my case (will attach example) I have the binding input/output @name not matching the portType input/output @name. Though wsimport has no problem generating Java compatible with my WSDL, the WSDL4J library processes my WSDL as having two distinct Operation(s) for my portType (will attach a sample program to show what I mean).
> Given the time it took me to realize what was going on later (I'll spare you the details), it seems a useful thing to do would have been for the WSDL introspector to flag this as an error instead of letting me go any further.
> Any issues with adding this type of validation?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.