You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/23 18:13:18 UTC
[vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Hi there,
I'd like to move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/maven-runtime/
Maven Runtime allows introspection of Maven project metadata at
runtime. For example, MavenProject instances can be obtained for all
projects given a classloader, optionally sorted into dependency order.
This is useful for tools wishing to utilise Maven metadata at
runtime.
Here's my +1.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
2008/4/30 Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> 2008/4/30 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi,
> > This component is very helpfull.
> > But I can't build it with jdk 1.4
> >
> > [INFO] Compilation failure
> > /local/olamy/open-source/maven-svn/tags/maven-runtime-1.0-alpha-1/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/shared/runtime/MavenRuntimeVisitorUtilsTest.java:[29,-1]
> > cannot access org.easymock.EasyMock
> > bad class file:
> > /local/olamy/.m2/repository/org/easymock/easymock/2.2/easymock-2.2.jar(org/easymock/EasyMock.class)
> > class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0
> >
> > bash-3.00$ mvn -v
> > Maven version: 2.0.9
> > Java version: 1.4.2_15
> > OS name: "sunos" version: "5.10" arch: "sparc" Family: "unix"
> >
> > And the class DelegatingClassLoader overrides Enumeration
> > getResources( String name ) which is final in 1.4.
>
> Thanks for pointing that out. I was quite tempted to move to 1.5
> anyhow since the API would really benefit from generic Lists, so I'll
> do that and call another vote.
>
>
> > The build is very long :
> >
> > Running org.apache.maven.shared.runtime.DefaultMavenRuntimeTest
> > Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 577.816 sec
>
> Yes, sorry about that, it's because the tests invoke Maven repeatedly
> on test projects to utilise the packaged jar. I could avoid that by
> directly committing the packaged jars to SVN, or by packaging them
> once for the entire testcase.
>
>
> > And last but not least and again this component is very (very) helpfull :-).
>
> Thanks :) I'm curious as to what you use it for?
obtaining the "version" of a class.
In my company we have an application "à la" mvn which dynamically use
different version of modules (in our app modules is similar to plugins
in mvn).
And it's more easy with this component to display the real version to
the end user.
>
>
> > I give my +1 (but IMHO the 1.5 pre requisite must be clearly write in
> > the documentation).
>
> I'll move to 1.5 and call another vote.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Olivier,
2008/4/30 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
> This component is very helpfull.
> But I can't build it with jdk 1.4
>
> [INFO] Compilation failure
> /local/olamy/open-source/maven-svn/tags/maven-runtime-1.0-alpha-1/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/shared/runtime/MavenRuntimeVisitorUtilsTest.java:[29,-1]
> cannot access org.easymock.EasyMock
> bad class file:
> /local/olamy/.m2/repository/org/easymock/easymock/2.2/easymock-2.2.jar(org/easymock/EasyMock.class)
> class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0
>
> bash-3.00$ mvn -v
> Maven version: 2.0.9
> Java version: 1.4.2_15
> OS name: "sunos" version: "5.10" arch: "sparc" Family: "unix"
>
> And the class DelegatingClassLoader overrides Enumeration
> getResources( String name ) which is final in 1.4.
Thanks for pointing that out. I was quite tempted to move to 1.5
anyhow since the API would really benefit from generic Lists, so I'll
do that and call another vote.
> The build is very long :
>
> Running org.apache.maven.shared.runtime.DefaultMavenRuntimeTest
> Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 577.816 sec
Yes, sorry about that, it's because the tests invoke Maven repeatedly
on test projects to utilise the packaged jar. I could avoid that by
directly committing the packaged jars to SVN, or by packaging them
once for the entire testcase.
> And last but not least and again this component is very (very) helpfull :-).
Thanks :) I'm curious as to what you use it for?
> I give my +1 (but IMHO the 1.5 pre requisite must be clearly write in
> the documentation).
I'll move to 1.5 and call another vote.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi,
This component is very helpfull.
But I can't build it with jdk 1.4
[INFO] Compilation failure
/local/olamy/open-source/maven-svn/tags/maven-runtime-1.0-alpha-1/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/shared/runtime/MavenRuntimeVisitorUtilsTest.java:[29,-1]
cannot access org.easymock.EasyMock
bad class file:
/local/olamy/.m2/repository/org/easymock/easymock/2.2/easymock-2.2.jar(org/easymock/EasyMock.class)
class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0
bash-3.00$ mvn -v
Maven version: 2.0.9
Java version: 1.4.2_15
OS name: "sunos" version: "5.10" arch: "sparc" Family: "unix"
And the class DelegatingClassLoader overrides Enumeration
getResources( String name ) which is final in 1.4.
The build is very long :
Running org.apache.maven.shared.runtime.DefaultMavenRuntimeTest
Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 577.816 sec
And last but not least and again this component is very (very) helpfull :-).
I give my +1 (but IMHO the 1.5 pre requisite must be clearly write in
the documentation).
--
Olivier
2008/4/29 Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>:
> 2008/4/29 Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu>:
>
> > I browsed the repo earlier and everything seemed in order, I have no
> > idea what this does or how to test it, but given that it's a shared
> > component that won't harm anyone, +1.
>
> Thanks. I tried to give a brief synopsis of maven-runtime at the
> start of this thread:
>
>
> "Maven Runtime allows introspection of Maven project metadata at
> runtime. For example, MavenProject instances can be obtained for all
> projects given a classloader, optionally sorted into dependency order.
> This is useful for tools wishing to utilise Maven metadata at
> runtime."
>
> Let me know if you need any more info.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
2008/4/29 Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu>:
> I browsed the repo earlier and everything seemed in order, I have no
> idea what this does or how to test it, but given that it's a shared
> component that won't harm anyone, +1.
Thanks. I tried to give a brief synopsis of maven-runtime at the
start of this thread:
"Maven Runtime allows introspection of Maven project metadata at
runtime. For example, MavenProject instances can be obtained for all
projects given a classloader, optionally sorted into dependency order.
This is useful for tools wishing to utilise Maven metadata at
runtime."
Let me know if you need any more info.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
RE: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
I browsed the repo earlier and everything seemed in order, I have no
idea what this does or how to test it, but given that it's a shared
component that won't harm anyone, +1.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:markhobson@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:41 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release
1.0-alpha-1
2008/4/25 Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Right, thanks for clarifying Brian.
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~markh/staging-repo/
>
> Guide to testing staged releases:
>
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
4hrs to go.. anyone?
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
2008/5/1 Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>:
> That might be the case, but it's something that we need to change. I've
> written docs for some of the shared components, and the shared parent now
> includes a site.xml including the necessary navigational and presentational
> aids.
>
> In my opinion we should require a site for every release, even for shared
> components and for alpha releases. It doesn't have to be all that
> complicated - just include a short description and a basic usage example.
> See the site of the, not yet released, shared component doxia tools for an
> example. Its not much but it's better than nothing.
>
> http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-doxia-tools/
Okay, sure, I'll knock up some documentation before I call another vote.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
Mark Hobson wrote:
> 2008/4/29 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > 4hrs to go.. anyone?
>>
>> Does it have docs? How would I test it?
>
> It has Javadoc but no site doc. I figured that since only a handful
> of shared components have site doc and that this is an alpha release
> it probably wasn't that imperative, correct me if I'm wrong.
That might be the case, but it's something that we need to change. I've
written docs for some of the shared components, and the shared parent
now includes a site.xml including the necessary navigational and
presentational aids.
In my opinion we should require a site for every release, even for
shared components and for alpha releases. It doesn't have to be all that
complicated - just include a short description and a basic usage
example. See the site of the, not yet released, shared component doxia
tools for an example. Its not much but it's better than nothing.
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-doxia-tools/
>
> Take a look at the unit tests for some examples of usage, specifically
> DefaultMavenRuntimeTest.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
2008/4/29 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 4hrs to go.. anyone?
>
> Does it have docs? How would I test it?
It has Javadoc but no site doc. I figured that since only a handful
of shared components have site doc and that this is an alpha release
it probably wasn't that imperative, correct me if I'm wrong.
Take a look at the unit tests for some examples of usage, specifically
DefaultMavenRuntimeTest.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 4hrs to go.. anyone?
Does it have docs? How would I test it?
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
2008/4/25 Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>:
> Right, thanks for clarifying Brian.
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~markh/staging-repo/
>
> Guide to testing staged releases:
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
4hrs to go.. anyone?
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
On 25/04/2008, Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu> wrote:
> You always need three pmc. Go ahead and stage the release to your p.a.o
> folder and then call a vote. Once you get the 3 PMC + 72hrs, you can use
> the stage plugin to move it to central.
Right, thanks for clarifying Brian.
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~markh/staging-repo/
Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
RE: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
You always need three pmc. Go ahead and stage the release to your p.a.o
folder and then call a vote. Once you get the 3 PMC + 72hrs, you can use
the stage plugin to move it to central.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hobson [mailto:markhobson@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 6:57 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release
1.0-alpha-1
On 25/04/2008, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > I just want to check before performing the release: are regular
> > committers allowed to release artifacts within the Maven project?
>
> Yes. Any committer can tag the svn repo and stage a release. The
> only time PMC membership comes into play is during the vote.
>
> > Checking the committer settings [1], apache.releases seems to be
> > reserved for PMC only.
> > [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>
> That needs to be changed, the last thing we want to do is discourage
> volunteer release managers. :)
Okay cool, thanks. I'd like to proceed with the release, do I have to
wait for three +1 PMC votes or is lazy consensus accepted for shared
components?
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
On 25/04/2008, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just want to check before performing the release: are regular
> > committers allowed to release artifacts within the Maven project?
>
> Yes. Any committer can tag the svn repo and stage a release. The
> only time PMC membership comes into play is during the vote.
>
> > Checking the committer settings [1], apache.releases seems to be
> > reserved for PMC only.
> > [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
>
> That needs to be changed, the last thing we want to do is discourage
> volunteer release managers. :)
Okay cool, thanks. I'd like to proceed with the release, do I have to
wait for three +1 PMC votes or is lazy consensus accepted for shared
components?
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just want to check before performing the release: are regular
> committers allowed to release artifacts within the Maven project?
Yes. Any committer can tag the svn repo and stage a release. The
only time PMC membership comes into play is during the vote.
> Checking the committer settings [1], apache.releases seems to be
> reserved for PMC only.
> [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
That needs to be changed, the last thing we want to do is discourage
volunteer release managers. :)
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
I just want to check before performing the release: are regular
committers allowed to release artifacts within the Maven project?
Checking the committer settings [1], apache.releases seems to be
reserved for PMC only.
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
Cheers,
Mark
On 25/04/2008, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm assuming a lazy consensus and moving maven-runtime out of the
> sandbox for a first release.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 23/04/2008, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'd like to move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/maven-runtime/
> >
> > Maven Runtime allows introspection of Maven project metadata at
> > runtime. For example, MavenProject instances can be obtained for all
> > projects given a classloader, optionally sorted into dependency order.
> > This is useful for tools wishing to utilise Maven metadata at
> > runtime.
> >
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Mark
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] Move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1
Posted by Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com>.
I'm assuming a lazy consensus and moving maven-runtime out of the
sandbox for a first release.
Cheers,
Mark
On 23/04/2008, Mark Hobson <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to move maven-runtime out of the sandbox and release 1.0-alpha-1:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/shared/maven-runtime/
>
> Maven Runtime allows introspection of Maven project metadata at
> runtime. For example, MavenProject instances can be obtained for all
> projects given a classloader, optionally sorted into dependency order.
> This is useful for tools wishing to utilise Maven metadata at
> runtime.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Mark
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org