You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@jakarta.apache.org by di...@multitask.com.au on 2003/02/07 00:35:23 UTC
Illegal distribution of binaries by Gump
I've noticed that Gump distributes (via gump.covalent.net) several jar
files which appear to violate the license agreements found in the
projects.
- xmlunit: The license requires:
"* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
with the distribution.
"
- Various xdoclet jars:
"Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
this
list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
and/or
other materials provided with the distribution."
- Werkz:
" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the
above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
materials provided with the distribution."
I'm sure there are many more.
Can someone please comment?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Illegal distribution of binaries by Gump
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> I've noticed that Gump distributes (via gump.covalent.net) several jar
> files which appear to violate the license agreements found in the
> projects.
>
> - xmlunit: The license requires:
> "* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
> copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
> disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
> with the distribution.
> "
>
> - Various xdoclet jars:
> "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
> this
> list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
> and/or
> other materials provided with the distribution."
>
> - Werkz:
> " 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the
> above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
> following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
> materials provided with the distribution."
>
> I'm sure there are many more.
Good catch. I'll correct, and review the others for compliance.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Illegal distribution of binaries by Gump
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> I've noticed that Gump distributes (via gump.covalent.net) several jar
> files which appear to violate the license agreements found in the
> projects.
>
> - xmlunit: The license requires:
> "* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
> copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
> disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
> with the distribution.
> "
>
> - Various xdoclet jars:
> "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
> this
> list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
> and/or
> other materials provided with the distribution."
>
> - Werkz:
> " 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the
> above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the
> following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other
> materials provided with the distribution."
>
> I'm sure there are many more.
Good catch. I'll correct, and review the others for compliance.
- Sam Ruby