You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Eric Milles (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/09/10 18:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-10177) TupleConstructor misses super properties in different compilation unit

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17413329#comment-17413329 ] 

Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-10177:
--------------------------------------

Is there anything special about {{Abstract}}?  Does it have any AST transforms applied or is the constructor explicitly declared?

> TupleConstructor misses super properties in different compilation unit
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-10177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10177
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.8
>            Reporter: Christopher Smith
>            Assignee: Eric Milles
>            Priority: Major
>
> I am using the following annotation on a concrete subclass of an abstract class:
> {code:groovy}
> @TupleConstructor(defaults = false, includeSuperProperties = true, callSuper = true)
> class Implementation extends Abstract {
> {code}
> When I compile both classes together, I get the expected behavior: The parameters specified in the {{Abstract}} constructor are copied to the parameter list of the {{Implementation}} constructor, and an immediate {{invokespecial}} to the super constructor is generated.
> However, if the two classes are compiled in separate passes, {{TupleConstructor}} instead omits the super parameters and passes defaults (nulls) to the super constructor. This happens consistently either with Eclipse incremental compilation or with a test implementation, which is compiled in the second {{compileTests}} goal.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)