Re: Why don't have a shindig-user mailing list?

[Jesse Hu <yi...@gmail.com>]

Let all subscribers creat a filter? They may be tired :)
+1 for shindig-dev@ and shindig-user@

Thanks!
2008/6/28 Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>:

> +1 if shindig-commits@ and shindig-issues@ will be activated too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
> 2008/6/27, Dan Peterson <dp...@google.com>:
>  > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Brown <et...@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >  > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:10 +0200, Chris Chabot wrote:
> >  > > > Unix host with shell access and imap? use procmail
> >  > > http://ugweb.cs.ualberta.ca/howtos/procmail.html
> >  > > > Corperate mail? Use outlook filters..
> >  > > > gmail? create rules!
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Most mail platforms have perfectly good solutions for this! :-)
> >  > >
> >  > > Having said that, I did some while ago create a shindig-commits@list
> >  > > for commit mails to go to, and a shindig-issues@ list for jira
> >  > > notifications. I just never got around to redirecting commit or jira
> >  > > mails.
> >  > >
> >  > > Is that something folks would like doing? I can certainly take care
> of
> >  > > the SVN commits side of things.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > It doesn't really matter to me since I'll subscribe to both anyway,
> but if
> >  > others find it helpful then go right ahead.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm +1, as it likely makes it easier for folks to get involved -- let's
> just
> >  make sure we announce it, so people can subscribe accordingly if they so
> >  choose (and not miss stuff).
> >
> >  If someone disagrees, please speak up.
> >
> >  -Dan
> >
> >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Upayavira
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  >
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,
Jesse