You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by ji...@jidanni.org on 2012/12/15 18:12:16 UTC
Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on the same line!
* 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
* (m2243.m8715[at]msa.hinet.net)
* -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
* 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
* digit (m2243.m8715[at]msa.hinet.net)
* -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
* trust
* [168.95.4.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES <--twice!
Re: Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:11:53 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 12/16/2012 8:43 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:25:44 +0100
> > Axb wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/15/2012 06:12 PM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> >>> Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
> >>> X-Spam-Report:
> >>> * 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on
> >> If rule doesn't have a description, rulename becomes the
> >> description
> > Personally, I'd rather it were just left blank or replaced with a
> > standard string.
> >
> > I find it makes it harder to notice a rule in the status report.
> I'd rather the rule have a description but I agree, a "no further
> description available" seems better. Can you open a bug report?
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6880
Re: Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
On 12/16/2012 8:43 AM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:25:44 +0100
> Axb wrote:
>
>> On 12/15/2012 06:12 PM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
>>> Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
>>> X-Spam-Report:
>>> * 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on
>> If rule doesn't have a description, rulename becomes the description
> Personally, I'd rather it were just left blank or replaced with a
> standard string.
>
> I find it makes it harder to notice a rule in the status report.
I'd rather the rule have a description but I agree, a "no further
description available" seems better. Can you open a bug report?
Re: Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:25:44 +0100
Axb wrote:
> On 12/15/2012 06:12 PM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> > Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
> > X-Spam-Report:
> > * 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on
>
> If rule doesn't have a description, rulename becomes the description
Personally, I'd rather it were just left blank or replaced with a
standard string.
I find it makes it harder to notice a rule in the status report.
Re: Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 12/15/2012 06:12 PM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
> X-Spam-Report:
> * 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on the same line!
> * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
> * (m2243.m8715[at]msa.hinet.net)
> * -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
> * 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
> * digit (m2243.m8715[at]msa.hinet.net)
> * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
> * trust
> * [168.95.4.112 listed in list.dnswl.org]
> * 1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES <--twice!
>
If rule doesn't have a description, rulename becomes the description