You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/10/11 11:06:51 UTC
[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1027) contrib/benchmark config does not
play nice with doubles with the flush.by.ram value
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12533989 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1027:
--------------------------------------------
Woops, I caused this when I added "double" as a parameter type in Config. Thanks Hoss. The patch looks good!
> contrib/benchmark config does not play nice with doubles with the flush.by.ram value
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1027
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1027
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: contrib/benchmark
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1027.patch
>
>
> In the o.a.l.benchmark.byTask.utils.Config.java file, the nextRound and various other methods do not handle doubles in the "round" property configuration syntax.
> To replicate this, copy the micro-standard.alg and replace
> merge.factor=mrg:10:100:10:100
> max.buffered=buf:10:10:100:100
> with
> ram.flush.mb=ram:32:40:48:56
> and you will get various ClassCastExceptions in Config (one in newRound() and, when that is fixed, in getColsValuesForValsByRound.
> The fix seems to be to just to mirror the handling of int[].
> The fix seems relatively minor. Patch shortly and will plan to commit tomorrow evening.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org