You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladislav Pyatkov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/11/15 17:55:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-18165) Apply short term loks to sorted indexes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vladislav Pyatkov updated IGNITE-18165:
---------------------------------------
Description:
*Motivation:*
Transaction isolation requires using short term locks in insert operation over sorted indexes. It was not implemented because short term locks had not supported.
According to the transaction protocol IEP [1] insert operation in RW transactions for sortex index looks as follows:
Unique index:
// insert
IX_short(nextKey) // released after the insertion
X_commit(currentKey) // acquired before releasing IX_short
Non-unique index:
// insert
IX_short(nextKey)
X_commit(currentKey) if nextKey previously locked in S, X or SIX mode
IX_commit(currentKey) otherwise
*Implementation notes:*
For the code related to locks for indexes, see org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.IndexLocker. We are interested in SortedIndexLocker implementation, method locksForInsert. Actually, there is some draft, but it is commented.
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-91%3A+Transaction+protocol
was:
*Motivation:*
Transaction isolation requires using short term locks in insert operation over sorted indexes. It was not implemented because short term locks had not supported.
*Implementation notes:*
According to the transaction protocol IEP [1] insert operation in RW transactions for sortex index looks as follows:
Unique index:
// insert
IX_short(nextKey) // released after the insertion
X_commit(currentKey) // acquired before releasing IX_short
Non-unique index:
// insert
IX_short(nextKey)
X_commit(currentKey) if nextKey previously locked in S, X or SIX mode
IX_commit(currentKey) otherwise
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-91%3A+Transaction+protocol
> Apply short term loks to sorted indexes
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-18165
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18165
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Vladislav Pyatkov
> Priority: Major
>
> *Motivation:*
> Transaction isolation requires using short term locks in insert operation over sorted indexes. It was not implemented because short term locks had not supported.
> According to the transaction protocol IEP [1] insert operation in RW transactions for sortex index looks as follows:
> Unique index:
> // insert
> IX_short(nextKey) // released after the insertion
> X_commit(currentKey) // acquired before releasing IX_short
> Non-unique index:
> // insert
> IX_short(nextKey)
> X_commit(currentKey) if nextKey previously locked in S, X or SIX mode
> IX_commit(currentKey) otherwise
> *Implementation notes:*
> For the code related to locks for indexes, see org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.IndexLocker. We are interested in SortedIndexLocker implementation, method locksForInsert. Actually, there is some draft, but it is commented.
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-91%3A+Transaction+protocol
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)