You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2009/11/20 02:38:26 UTC
seeking review on plan/work for MRM-1025
Hi,
I have again picked up the task of removing the requirement of the database from Archiva (seeking to push it over to either an optional add-on, or replace it with an alternative). We use very little of the data in there for core functionality at the moment.
The main reasoning is to clean up the architecture though and remove a certain classification of bugs that we get on a regular basis.
I'd like to make sure the work I'm doing is reviewed though, even though it's on a branch. If you get time to review the code, please do. Short of that, please sanity check the current plan: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1025
If you have any questions, comments, or would like to help, just shout!
- Brett
Re: seeking review on plan/work for MRM-1025
Posted by Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Hehe thanks!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> We need the animal sniffer :)
>
> I've fixed this one.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 19/01/2010, at 9:30 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
>
> > Hi Brett,
> >
> > I'm getting a compilation error in
> >
> ../plugins/metadata-repository-file/src/main/java/org/apache/archiva/metadata/repository/file/FileMetadataRepository.java
> > regarding the use of stringPropertyNames() method in
> java.util.Properties.
> > I'm using Java 1.5 but the method is available starting 1.6. Should this
> be
> > set as a requirement in the build?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Deng
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> In addition, this is the content model I was thinking of:
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/branches/MRM-1025/archiva-modules/metadata/content-model.txt(represented<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/branches/MRM-1025/archiva-modules/metadata/content-model.txt%28represented>as a tree structure, and can be rendered in XML, json, etc.)
> >>
> >> Somewhat simpler but still as flexible as the one previously on the
> wiki.
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 20/11/2009, at 12:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have again picked up the task of removing the requirement of the
> >> database from Archiva (seeking to push it over to either an optional
> add-on,
> >> or replace it with an alternative). We use very little of the data in
> there
> >> for core functionality at the moment.
> >>>
> >>> The main reasoning is to clean up the architecture though and remove a
> >> certain classification of bugs that we get on a regular basis.
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to make sure the work I'm doing is reviewed though, even
> though
> >> it's on a branch. If you get time to review the code, please do. Short
> of
> >> that, please sanity check the current plan:
> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1025
> >>>
> >>> If you have any questions, comments, or would like to help, just shout!
> >>>
> >>> - Brett
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>
Re: seeking review on plan/work for MRM-1025
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
We need the animal sniffer :)
I've fixed this one.
- Brett
On 19/01/2010, at 9:30 PM, Deng Ching wrote:
> Hi Brett,
>
> I'm getting a compilation error in
> ../plugins/metadata-repository-file/src/main/java/org/apache/archiva/metadata/repository/file/FileMetadataRepository.java
> regarding the use of stringPropertyNames() method in java.util.Properties.
> I'm using Java 1.5 but the method is available starting 1.6. Should this be
> set as a requirement in the build?
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> In addition, this is the content model I was thinking of:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/branches/MRM-1025/archiva-modules/metadata/content-model.txt(represented as a tree structure, and can be rendered in XML, json, etc.)
>>
>> Somewhat simpler but still as flexible as the one previously on the wiki.
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 20/11/2009, at 12:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have again picked up the task of removing the requirement of the
>> database from Archiva (seeking to push it over to either an optional add-on,
>> or replace it with an alternative). We use very little of the data in there
>> for core functionality at the moment.
>>>
>>> The main reasoning is to clean up the architecture though and remove a
>> certain classification of bugs that we get on a regular basis.
>>>
>>> I'd like to make sure the work I'm doing is reviewed though, even though
>> it's on a branch. If you get time to review the code, please do. Short of
>> that, please sanity check the current plan:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1025
>>>
>>> If you have any questions, comments, or would like to help, just shout!
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: seeking review on plan/work for MRM-1025
Posted by Deng Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Hi Brett,
I'm getting a compilation error in
../plugins/metadata-repository-file/src/main/java/org/apache/archiva/metadata/repository/file/FileMetadataRepository.java
regarding the use of stringPropertyNames() method in java.util.Properties.
I'm using Java 1.5 but the method is available starting 1.6. Should this be
set as a requirement in the build?
Thanks,
Deng
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> In addition, this is the content model I was thinking of:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/branches/MRM-1025/archiva-modules/metadata/content-model.txt(represented as a tree structure, and can be rendered in XML, json, etc.)
>
> Somewhat simpler but still as flexible as the one previously on the wiki.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 20/11/2009, at 12:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have again picked up the task of removing the requirement of the
> database from Archiva (seeking to push it over to either an optional add-on,
> or replace it with an alternative). We use very little of the data in there
> for core functionality at the moment.
> >
> > The main reasoning is to clean up the architecture though and remove a
> certain classification of bugs that we get on a regular basis.
> >
> > I'd like to make sure the work I'm doing is reviewed though, even though
> it's on a branch. If you get time to review the code, please do. Short of
> that, please sanity check the current plan:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1025
> >
> > If you have any questions, comments, or would like to help, just shout!
> >
> > - Brett
>
>
Re: seeking review on plan/work for MRM-1025
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
In addition, this is the content model I was thinking of: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/branches/MRM-1025/archiva-modules/metadata/content-model.txt (represented as a tree structure, and can be rendered in XML, json, etc.)
Somewhat simpler but still as flexible as the one previously on the wiki.
- Brett
On 20/11/2009, at 12:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have again picked up the task of removing the requirement of the database from Archiva (seeking to push it over to either an optional add-on, or replace it with an alternative). We use very little of the data in there for core functionality at the moment.
>
> The main reasoning is to clean up the architecture though and remove a certain classification of bugs that we get on a regular basis.
>
> I'd like to make sure the work I'm doing is reviewed though, even though it's on a branch. If you get time to review the code, please do. Short of that, please sanity check the current plan: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1025
>
> If you have any questions, comments, or would like to help, just shout!
>
> - Brett