You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> on 2014/09/23 10:01:47 UTC
MD5Checker job failed
The console output says
BUILD FAILED
c:\Jenkins\workspace\MD5Checker\MD5Checker\build.xml:103: MD5's changed!
Do we need to do anything ?
--
extravision Signature
*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
<http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
<http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
<ma...@extravision.com>
.
.
A fresh approach to email marketing
.
Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
My guess would be: figure out which MD5 became obsolete and replace it with
the current one … But this is one from Alex, so without looking at the code
I couldn’t say how …
EdB
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> The console output says
>
> BUILD FAILED
> c:\Jenkins\workspace\MD5Checker\MD5Checker\build.xml:103: MD5's changed!
>
> Do we need to do anything ?
> --
> extravision Signature
> *Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
> *T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com <http://www.extravision.com>
> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision <http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:*
> tchiverton@extravision.com <ma...@extravision.com>
> .
> .
> A fresh approach to email marketing
>
> .
> Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street, Manchester,
> M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
> addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
> have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
> e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
> distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
> attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely of
> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
> E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
> amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
> this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Yes, they are public. We just don’t give out the logins ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> Are both the Jenkin's URLs intended to be public ?
>
> If so I'll update the Jenkins Wiki page. I think it's better to have the
> docs seperate from code ?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 23/09/14 18:23, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I don't know of a place today, but feel free to create one. Or maybe in
>> this case, update the output to be more explicit on how to help.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/23/14 7:49 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>
>> Cool.
>>>
>>> Is there already somewhere on the Wiki we can start documenting things
>>> like this, that way any one can help out ?
>>> I didn't see any where particularly relevant if not; maybe under
>>> Commiteers > Jenkins ?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On 23/09/14 14:38, Alex Harui wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sometimes, just the cacheID changes. Thanks for monitoring the
>>>> situation.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/23/14 6:18 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The old and new nodes seem to have the same <md5> to me ?
>>>>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/109/console
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll remember to look in on commits@
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/09/14 14:12, Alex Harui wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The console output should also show what changes to
>>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>>> service.
>>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Are both the Jenkin's URLs intended to be public ?
If so I'll update the Jenkins Wiki page. I think it's better to have the
docs seperate from code ?
Tom
On 23/09/14 18:23, Alex Harui wrote:
> I don't know of a place today, but feel free to create one. Or maybe in
> this case, update the output to be more explicit on how to help.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/23/14 7:49 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
>> Cool.
>>
>> Is there already somewhere on the Wiki we can start documenting things
>> like this, that way any one can help out ?
>> I didn't see any where particularly relevant if not; maybe under
>> Commiteers > Jenkins ?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 23/09/14 14:38, Alex Harui wrote:
>>> Sometimes, just the cacheID changes. Thanks for monitoring the
>>> situation.
>>>
>>> On 9/23/14 6:18 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The old and new nodes seem to have the same <md5> to me ?
>>>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/109/console
>>>>
>>>> I'll remember to look in on commits@
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> On 23/09/14 14:12, Alex Harui wrote:
>>>>> The console output should also show what changes to
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>> service.
>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I don't know of a place today, but feel free to create one. Or maybe in
this case, update the output to be more explicit on how to help.
-Alex
On 9/23/14 7:49 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>Cool.
>
>Is there already somewhere on the Wiki we can start documenting things
>like this, that way any one can help out ?
>I didn't see any where particularly relevant if not; maybe under
>Commiteers > Jenkins ?
>
>Tom
>
>On 23/09/14 14:38, Alex Harui wrote:
>> Sometimes, just the cacheID changes. Thanks for monitoring the
>>situation.
>>
>> On 9/23/14 6:18 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The old and new nodes seem to have the same <md5> to me ?
>>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/109/console
>>>
>>> I'll remember to look in on commits@
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On 23/09/14 14:12, Alex Harui wrote:
>>>> The console output should also show what changes to
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Cool.
Is there already somewhere on the Wiki we can start documenting things
like this, that way any one can help out ?
I didn't see any where particularly relevant if not; maybe under
Commiteers > Jenkins ?
Tom
On 23/09/14 14:38, Alex Harui wrote:
> Sometimes, just the cacheID changes. Thanks for monitoring the situation.
>
> On 9/23/14 6:18 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
>> The old and new nodes seem to have the same <md5> to me ?
>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/109/console
>>
>> I'll remember to look in on commits@
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 23/09/14 14:12, Alex Harui wrote:
>>> The console output should also show what changes to
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Sometimes, just the cacheID changes. Thanks for monitoring the situation.
On 9/23/14 6:18 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>The old and new nodes seem to have the same <md5> to me ?
>http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/109/console
>
>I'll remember to look in on commits@
>
>Tom
>
>On 23/09/14 14:12, Alex Harui wrote:
>> The console output should also show what changes to
>
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
The old and new nodes seem to have the same <md5> to me ?
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/109/console
I'll remember to look in on commits@
Tom
On 23/09/14 14:12, Alex Harui wrote:
> The console output should also show what changes to
Re: MD5Checker job failed
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
The console output should also show what changes to
sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml need to be made. I already made the change
from run #109 but forgot to push it live on the web site. I just pushed
it. If you are subscribed to commits@ you can look to see if anyone has
reacted to the failure.
-Alex
On 9/23/14 1:01 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>The console output says
>
>BUILD FAILED
>c:\Jenkins\workspace\MD5Checker\MD5Checker\build.xml:103: MD5's changed!
>
>Do we need to do anything ?
>--
>extravision Signature
>*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
>*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
><http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
><http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
><ma...@extravision.com>
>.
>.
> A fresh approach to email marketing
>
>.
>Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
>Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
>
>Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
>addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
>have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
>e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
>distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
>attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
>of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
>E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
>amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
>this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
>