You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by hw...@apache.org on 2010/06/17 19:16:57 UTC
svn commit: r955678 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Jun 17 17:16:56 2010
New Revision: 955678
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=955678&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Remove a comment from the r879966, and approve it.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=955678&r1=955677&r2=955678&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Thu Jun 17 17:16:56 2010
@@ -31,23 +31,6 @@ Candidate changes:
works correctly. I think the not interactive code path
needs the same fix).
- * r879966, r879971
- Reduce the lifetime of the rep-sharing database handles in FSFS to avoid
- having writers blocking readers, and update that database outside the
- general FSFS write lock. This addresses issue #3506.
- Justification:
- The performance problems and outright failures of the current code
- are hurting the ASF repository, and presumably other high-concurrency
- repositories, too, when large commits occur.
- Justification:
- Pre-requisite for the r934599 group.
- Branch:
- ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-issue3506
- Votes:
- +1: danielsh, cmpilato
- +1: hwright (though I think this should only be merged with the r934599
- group)
-
* r934599, r934603
Fix a concurrency issue in the FSFS rep-cache code. This indirectly
concerns issue #3506.
@@ -234,3 +217,18 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
Approved changes:
=================
+
+ * r879966, r879971
+ Reduce the lifetime of the rep-sharing database handles in FSFS to avoid
+ having writers blocking readers, and update that database outside the
+ general FSFS write lock. This addresses issue #3506.
+ Justification:
+ The performance problems and outright failures of the current code
+ are hurting the ASF repository, and presumably other high-concurrency
+ repositories, too, when large commits occur.
+ Justification:
+ Pre-requisite for the r934599 group.
+ Branch:
+ ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-issue3506
+ Votes:
+ +1: danielsh, cmpilato, hwright