[PR] [RUNTIME][CLML] Dynamic backward compatibility [tvm]

["srkreddy1238 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

srkreddy1238 opened a new pull request, #17516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/17516

   We can now build one binary and use across targets Compiler pass config to choose target clml support version
   
   Introducing compiler config "relay.ext.clml.target_version".
   Partition pass will choose offloading ops based on target support.
   This config enables choosing target version on python api as well as tvmc.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@tvm.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [RUNTIME][CLML] Dynamic backward compatibility [tvm]

["tqchen (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

tqchen merged PR #17516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/17516


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@tvm.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

Re: [PR] [RUNTIME][CLML] Dynamic backward compatibility [tvm]

["tqchen (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

tqchen commented on PR #17516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/17516#issuecomment-2476460979

   Thanks @srkreddy1238 , as noted in other threads, we should phase out relay and move towards relax based pipelines, CLML could be a great candidate there


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@tvm.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org